[GRASS-user] R: R: R: R: NULL values as output of i.atcorr
ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com
ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 28 05:56:23 PST 2022
Thank you very much for your support! I will keep you update on my (I hope) progresses!
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be>
Inviato: venerdì 28 gennaio 2022 12:07
A: ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com; 'Maris Nartiss' <maris.gis at gmail.com>
Cc: 'GRASS user list' <grass-user at lists.osgeo.org>
Oggetto: Re: R: R: R: [GRASS-user] NULL values as output of i.atcorr
On 28/01/22 10:55, ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com wrote:
> Thank you Moritz, I will do some research on visibility (aerosol model concentration) to put a reasonable value there (any suggestion is appreciated, also regarding references to look at).
The man page suggests https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/.
> How can I transform digital number into radiance/reflectance?
This information should be in the metadata that accompanies the Sentinel data. I haven't worked with this data in a couple of years, so don't remember.
However, in the doc on
https://docs.sentinel-hub.com/api/latest/data/sentinel-2-l2a/, you can read:
For Sentinel-2 optical data, the relation between DN and REFLECTANCE (default unit) is: DN = 10000 * REFLECTANCE.
Moritz
> Thank you very much for your precious help!
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be>
> Inviato: giovedì 27 gennaio 2022 17:50
> A: ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com; 'Maris Nartiss' <maris.gis at gmail.com>
> Cc: 'GRASS user list' <grass-user at lists.osgeo.org>
> Oggetto: Re: R: R: [GRASS-user] NULL values as output of i.atcorr
>
> On 27/01/22 14:54, ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com wrote:
>> The output of r.info is the following
>>
>> r.info map=immagine at mapset
>> +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | Map: immagine at mapset Date: Tue Nov 30 12:51:12 2021 |
>> | Mapset: mapset Login of Creator: [...] |
>> | Location: WGS84_UTM32 |
>> | DataBase: C:\Users\[...]\grassdata |
>> | Title: immagine |
>> | Timestamp: none |
>> |----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> | |
>> | Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 0 |
>> | Data Type: CELL |
>> | Rows: 10980 |
>> | Columns: 10980 |
>> | Total Cells: 120560400 |
>> | Projection: UTM (zone 32) |
>> | N: 4900020 S: 4790220 Res: 10 |
>> | E: 609780 W: 499980 Res: 10 |
>> | Range of data: min = 0 max = 18876 |
>> | |
>> | Data Description: |
>> | generato da r.in.gdal |
>> | |
>> | Comments: |
>> | r.in.gdal -e input="C:\Users\[...]\T32TNP_2020062\ |
>> | 2T100559_B04.jp2" output="immagine" memory=300 offset=0 num_digits=0 |
>> | |
>>
>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------
>> +-
>> -------+
>
> This looks to me like the data is in digital number, not in radiance or reflectance. You first have to translate it to one or the other before feeding it to i.attcor.
>
>>
>> Do you mean the sixth line of the file? From the i.atcorr help it is the "mean target elevation above sea level [km]", and it is correct that it is negative.
>> I'm now wondering if the problem can be having put "0" for visibility (aerosol model concentration, fifth line). What do you think about it?
>
> I am speaking about the value '-0.293' in line 6 (and yes, my bad for
> not paying attention to the value 0 in the line before). The man page
> states: "If you have an estimate of aerosol optical depth, enter 0 for the visibility and in a following line enter the aerosol optical depth at 550nm (iaer means 'i' for input and 'aer' for aerosol), for example:"
> So, if you have 0 on line 5, so line 6 is AOD and not mean target elevation above sea level.
>
> In this case line 7 is the "mean target elevation above sea level [-km]"
> with value -1000 :-).
>
> Moritz
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> -----Messaggio originale-----
>> Da: Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be>
>> Inviato: giovedì 27 gennaio 2022 14:08
>> A: ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com; 'Maris Nartiss' <maris.gis at gmail.com>
>> Cc: 'GRASS user list' <grass-user at lists.osgeo.org>
>> Oggetto: Re: R: [GRASS-user] NULL values as output of i.atcorr
>>
>> On 27/01/22 14:01, ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com wrote:
>>> Dear Moritz,
>>> thank you for your reply.
>>> I tried with and without the -r flag and the results is the same.
>>
>> I reformulate this part of the question then: what exactly is the
>> content of immagine at mapset ? Please provide the output of
>>
>> r.info map=immagine at mapset
>>
>>
>>> Please find attached the parameters of the file 22giugno2020_b4.txt:
>>>
>>> 26
>>> 6 22 17.05 9.68728523 43.75514951
>>> 2
>>> 1
>>> 0
>>> -0.293
>>
>> Are you sure this should be a negative number ? This should be visibility in km IIRC.
>>
>>> -1000
>>> 182
>>
>>
>> Moritz
>>>
>>> -----Messaggio originale-----
>>> Da: Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be>
>>> Inviato: giovedì 27 gennaio 2022 13:22
>>> A: Ilaria Ferrando <ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com>; Maris Nartiss
>>> <maris.gis at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: GRASS user list <grass-user at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> Oggetto: Re: [GRASS-user] NULL values as output of i.atcorr
>>>
>>> On 26/01/22 19:50, Ilaria Ferrando wrote:
>>>> Dear Māris,
>>>> Thank you for your reply.
>>>> Yes, the image is inside the computational region.
>>>> Any other ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>> 1) Are you sure your input data is reflectance (-r flag used) ?
>>> 2) Could you provide us with the contents of the 22giugno2020_b4.txt file ?
>>>
>>> Moritz
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Il mer 26 gen 2022, 19:45 Maris Nartiss <maris.gis at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:maris.gis at gmail.com>> ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>> One thing to always check – does your computational region contain
>>>> data you are analysing? Try to run `g.region rast=immagine` before
>>>> running i.atcorr.
>>>>
>>>> Māris.
>>>>
>>>> trešd., 2022. g. 26. janv., plkst. 18:13 — lietotājs
>>>> <ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com <mailto:ilaria.ferrando87 at gmail.com>>
>>>> rakstīja:
>>>> >
>>>> > Dear all,
>>>> >
>>>> > I am having troubles in processing a Sentinel-2 image with i.atcorr.
>>>> >
>>>> > The command I use is the following:
>>>> >
>>>> > i.atcorr -r -input=immagine at mapset range=0,10000
>>>> parameters=C:\...\22giugno2020_b4.txt output=immagine_atcorr rescale=0,1
>>>> >
>>>> > and I obtain this output:
>>>> >
>>>> > wavelength less than 0.25 micron:
>>>> >
>>>> > let's take s(l)=s(0.25)
>>>> >
>>>> > Atmospheric correction...
>>>> >
>>>> > Atmospheric correction complete.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > The map I obtain is constituted by pixels with 6.669033e-34 values.
>>>> >
>>>> > Can anyone explain the meaning of the output and why I obtain a
>>>> NULL value corrected map?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you for your support.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > grass-user mailing list
>>>> > grass-user at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:grass-user at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
>>>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> grass-user mailing list
>>>> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list