 
> Bill Baker writes:
> 
> >There is a request in one of the README files that if the code is used
> >that a published article we wrote about the programs be cited. 
> 
> >Short of scientific etiquette,....
 
Helena Mitasova writes:
> Bill, you are not the only one and we share your concern. 
> Because GRASS is still a public domain software,....
 
The situation is yet more difficult, I think, because few users 
are aware of the distinctions between which GRASS routines are
from the original GRASS group, and which are "add-ons", deserving
additional mention by citation or reference.  Lab administrators
will have read the README documents that come with the various
extra pieces, during the install process, but unless the lab
administrators inform the researchers using the products, it is
unlikely a user will know that s.surf.tps, for instance, should
be referenced separately.  In fact it is unlikely the administrator
(not being a publishing academic, with an academic's acute awareness
of the importance of citations to the annual review process) will
even notice such a detail in the documentation, while focusing on
installation procedures and software functionality.

It's a poser, all right!  As a lab administrator/coordinator, I
will try to remember to add these details to the list of many 
things I inform the users about.  That, and not to press the reset
button on the RS/6000 when the screen seems not to be responding.

Tim.

 -----------------------------------------------------------------
 Tim Martin                     *  
 Spatial Information Systems    *     Peculiar travel suggestions
 University of Alberta          *     are dance lessons from God. 
 Tim.Martin@UAlberta.CA         *                        -Bokonon
 (403) 492-6586                 *
 -----------------------------------------------------------------


