[Incubator] be careful when "defining a PSC" - perhaps you already have one?

[Jody Garnett]

Just a general note; while a PSC is nice and all it is good for us to 
respect the process a project already has - I found that by asking about 
the GeoNetwork PSC the existing "GeoNetwork Advisor Board" did not reply.

What we really want to check when incubating projects is that their *is* 
a process and that it is open enough for other organizations or 
individuals to join. It really helps if the "how to join" part is 
documented (merit? involvement? money?), and a history of past decisions 
(showing that the process can accomplish something).

So my question for gvSIG is - how are decisions and directions made 
right now? Perhaps you have things under control already....
Jody

> Hello
>
> First at all, yesterday on the IncCom meeting Frank required a representative for every project in incubation. So, (with the approved permission of the gvSIG officer) I present myself as gvSIG rep during incubation process.
>
> Anyway, I've updated the Incubation Status Report[1] to add current info about gvSIG (mailing lists, downloads area, etc).
>
> Any comment is appreciated.
>
> Next step for us (after 3rd gvSIG Conf storm) is to define a PSC (or whatever name it will have), write down the governance rules of the gvSIG project and start code review.
>
> Best regards.
> [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/GvSIG_Incubation_Status
> --
> Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas
> gvSIG OSGeo Incubation coordinator
> Prodevelop S.L. - Valencia - España
> Tlf.:  96.351.06.12 - Fax:   96.351.09.68 
> http://www.prodevelop.es
> http://www.gvsig.gva.es
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>