[Incubator] Geotools for Graduation - a couple of questions

[Jody Garnett]

Quick question - should I be voting +0 since on this one as a member of 
the GeoTools community?
We may also want to considered if a raised bar is a good thing; or if 
the GeoTools community is just doing a complete overkill?

Jody

Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Try again (last email bounced) ....
>
> Cameron Shorter wrote:
>> OSGeo Incubation committee,
>>
>> I am delighted to report that the Geotools community have completed 
>> an extraordinary, meticulous effort pushing geotools through 
>> incubation and now have it ready for graduation.
>>
>> I have reviewed all the documentation and am satisfied that it comes 
>> up to scratch and that geotools have addressed the incubation 
>> provenance review criteria.
>>
>> By watching the Geotools community in action, and by the high quality 
>> of their documented Software processes I think that Geotools have 
>> raised the bar for OSGeo graduation criteria.
>>
>> I'm hopeful that we can vote Geotools through incubation before the 
>> OSGeo board meet this Friday 11 July.
>>
>> The key documents for review are:
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoTools_Project_Status
>> and
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/GeoTools+Provenance+Review
>>
>>
>> I will be doing a thin slice review of source code headers tomorrow 
>> morning, but don't expect any issues there.
>>
>> Please vote: +1, 0, -1
>>
>
>