[Incubator] Re: Recommend Geotools for Graduation - please vote before Friday

[Frank Warmerdam]

+1

I have reviewed the materials and I'm satisfied.

Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Try again (last email bounced) ....
> 
> Cameron Shorter wrote:
>> OSGeo Incubation committee,
>>
>> I am delighted to report that the Geotools community have completed an 
>> extraordinary, meticulous effort pushing geotools through incubation 
>> and now have it ready for graduation.
>>
>> I have reviewed all the documentation and am satisfied that it comes 
>> up to scratch and that geotools have addressed the incubation 
>> provenance review criteria.
>>
>> By watching the Geotools community in action, and by the high quality 
>> of their documented Software processes I think that Geotools have 
>> raised the bar for OSGeo graduation criteria.
>>
>> I'm hopeful that we can vote Geotools through incubation before the 
>> OSGeo board meet this Friday 11 July.
>>
>> The key documents for review are:
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoTools_Project_Status
>> and
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/GeoTools+Provenance+Review
>>
>>
>> I will be doing a thin slice review of source code headers tomorrow 
>> morning, but don't expect any issues there.
>>
>> Please vote: +1, 0, -1
>>
> 
> 


-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org