[Incubator] OSSIM Incubation - header file modifications
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Tue Mar 31 03:53:20 EDT 2009
All I'd add are a few caveats which allow you to change your processes
further down the track if you attract developers from another geographic
Eg: "Typically meetings will be held at Last Stand in downtown Melbourne
Florida, but may be located elsewhere, or moved elsewhere or onto
teleconference or similar, as agreed by participants."
Mark Lucas wrote:
> Cameron and Jody,
> Yes, thanks for the inputs. I've made another pass through the
> related wiki pages. Expanded on Cameron's suggestions here:
> We'll plan on proceeding with the header modifications later this week
> after coordination with the OSSIM mailing list.
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>> Thanks Mark, yes I believe such a header is fine.
>> The issue I raised was to do with decision making transparency. Has
>> that been resolved?
>> Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>> Face to face meetings are more effective than email lists for
>>> working out project issues.
>>> The only downside is that they don't automatically generate logs of
>>> discussions like email lists and IRC channels.
>>> What I suggest is:
>>> * Write down your process for meetings, which would probably be
>>> something like:
>>> ** Send meeting request, xx number of days before meeting, allowing
>>> interested parties to participate.
>>> ** Meet face to face
>>> ** Describe voting process (1 member = 1 vote)
>>> ** Document decisions in wiki/email list/ ...
>>> The documented decisions are the key part that you will reference in
>>> order to prove an effective PSC.
>>> Is this achievable?
>> Jody Garnett wrote:
>>> The LGPL license has a sample header file which is a little bit longer
>>> than that; but what you describe sounds fine.
>>> Indeed you email here addresses the two issues initially raised:
>>> - header file indicating which license the source code is made
>>> available under
>>> - license included
>>> There was also some questions about process / visibility. Is their a
>>> revised document for us to review?
>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Mark Lucas <mlucas17 at mac.com> wrote:
>>>> We have written a script and test plan to modify 1308 header files
>>>> in the
>>>> ossim baseline adding the following lines at the beginning of the
>>>> // The OSSIM distribution is licensed under LGPL
>>>> // See the LICENSE.txt in the ossim folder for details
>>>> We have placed this recommendation on the OSSIM mailing list and
>>>> have not
>>>> received any objections from the OSSIM community.
>>>> Before making the change we would like some feedback from the
>>>> committee that this will address the previously raised comments.
>>>> Are there any additional concerns or actions required to complete the
>>>> incubation process?
>>> Incubator mailing list
>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>> Cameron Shorter
>> Geospatial Systems Architect
>> Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
>> Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
>> Think Globally, Fix Locally
>> Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
Geospatial Systems Architect
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
More information about the Incubator