[Incubator] next Incubator Committee meeting: request for rasdaman incubation decision

[Peter Baumann]

Dear incubation committee,

may I kindly ask you to put formal decision on incubation status for the 
rasdaman project on the next committee meeting agenda. Resp. ticket is 
http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/553, Bruce Bannerman kindly 
volunteers as mentor, website is www.rasdaman.org .

When will the next meeting take place?

Regards,
Peter



On 09/16/2010 04:51 PM, Pieter De Graef wrote:
> Make sure the incubation application is on the agenda for the next OSGeo
> incubation meeting on IRC.
>
>
> Peter Baumann schreef:
>    
>> Dear Christopher,
>>
>> thanks for your detailed explanation of the plot. But, as mentioned in
>> my posting, we do have a mentor (Bruce Bannerman), he already has
>> started looking into the licence issues etc.
>>
>> So all the issues you mention are set, we are just awaiting the signal.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09/16/2010 12:45 PM, christopher.schmidt at nokia.com wrote:
>>      
>>> On Sep 16, 2010, at 4:39 AM, ext Peter Baumann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Hi list,
>>>>
>>>> like with Geomajas (see recent mail) we experienced FOSS4G as an
>>>> exciting exchange of ideas. As a consequence, let me raise again the
>>>> issue of rasdaman incubation.
>>>>
>>>> Our application was confirmed in May 2009, the resp. ticket is
>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/553. We like to think that we have
>>>> everything ready for checking, in particular all licence stuff is well
>>>> documented.
>>>> Bruce Bannerman has agreed to be our mentor.
>>>>
>>>> Hence, what is missing from your perspective for entering incubation?
>>>>
>>>> INTERGEO fair is ante portas (3 weeks) where we will present rasdaman,
>>>> and it would be great to be able to mention at least that we are in
>>>> incubation.
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> OSGeo incubation is a process that is time consuming, and largely
>>> limited
>>> by volunteer time in the form of incubation mentors. At this time, the
>>> OSGeo incubation process depends on someone who is confident to spend
>>> possibly dozens of hours reviewing a project to take that project on and
>>> make that offer.
>>>
>>> Incubation mentors are self-selecting; they will tend to gravitate
>>> towards
>>> projects that they are personally interested in. Often, these are larger
>>> projects, or projects that are seen as more strategically valuable in
>>> the
>>> mind of the volunteer.
>>>
>>> At this time, I do not believe it is intended that the incubation
>>> committee
>>> is looking to change this tactic for selecting projects, which means
>>> that
>>> projects are not allowed into incubation based on when they applied, but
>>> instead based on some combination of volunteer interest and expressed
>>> community interest.
>>>
>>> As a result, there is likely no estimated timeline for when the project
>>> will enter incubation, and I do not think that anyone would be able
>>> to give
>>> you a reasonable estimate of such a timeline -- though I will say that
>>> the faster other projects finish, the more incubation volunteer time
>>> there is available.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Christopher Schmidt
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>      
>    

-- 
Dr. Peter Baumann
  - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
    www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann
    mail: p.baumann at jacobs-university.de
    tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
  - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 147737)
    www.rasdaman.com, mail: baumann at rasdaman.com
    tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
"Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)