[Incubator] Vote: GeoMoose Graduation

[Bruce Bannerman]

+1


I can see what appear to be good open processes for contribution, PSC etc.

The documented meeting notes over an extended period of time supports this.

The issue of license is difficult to follow through the document. It would
be better to get this clarified on the wiki with a *very* clear statement.
I noted Cameron's concerns on documentation license and Bob's response. I
personally would have preferred to see an appropriate Creative Commons
license for the documentation.

The wiki page [1] link to ticket #180 actually points to #190.

Bruce

[1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoMoose_Incubation_Checklist


*From: *Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
*Date: *Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:55:22 +1100
*To: *Incubator <Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
*Subject: *[Incubator] Vote: GeoMoose Graduation



 I'd like to make a motion to recommend GeoMoose for graduation from the
incubation process.

(I will need a second, and then you can reply to this email, if you like
you can review the discussion last week for the incubation checklist and my
notes when mentoring the project)

-- 
Jody Garnett




------ End of Forwarded Message
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20130322/22111317/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.txt
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 150 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20130322/22111317/attachment.obj>