[Incubator] checking in with - CITE Team engine [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Jody Garnett]

OSGeo and LocationTech incubation are not incompatible (both foundations
are actually looking for slightly different things). Still until we get a
request to withdraw the project has still been accepted into incubation -
and is just missing in action (or missing in-action).
--
Jody

Jody Garnett

On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Bruce Bannerman <B.Bannerman at bom.gov.au>
wrote:

> Jody,
>
> As per an earlier email that I sent to the Standards list, I suspect that
> this incubation work may have moved to LocationTech, as per Louis'
> announcement at the Washington OGC TC in March this year..
>
> I don't think that we got to the bottom of just what OGC were doing.
>
> Bruce
>
> ________________________________________
> From: incubator-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [incubator-bounces at lists.osgeo.org]
> On Behalf Of Jody Garnett [jody.garnett at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 7 September 2014 7:44 AM
> To: Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [Incubator] checking in with - CITE Team engine
>
> I have been subscribed to the cite-dev list for sometime, and had occasion
> to email yesterday in regards to collaboration at the foss4g code sprint.
>
> Basically Justin supplied details on the incubation checklist in 2010 when
> they were approved ... and that is it. Single email, no response.
>
> It could be I am just on the wrong list, or that the members of cite-dev
> were just not "on board" with joining OSGeo. Other than that I see meetings
> occurring via VOIP, fairly constant developer activity and so forth.
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20140907/3d0438b0/attachment.html>