[Incubator] [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure

[Jody Garnett]

Limiting the following comment to the incubation list - the trouble with
the incubation process is the first step is the hardest one: checking that
your code has an open source license.

It could be some kind of automation could help here? pycsw and geoserver
both documented regex expression used for a second opinion.

--
Jody Garnett

On 16 February 2015 at 03:44, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to dig a bit more into the topic "more fine incubation"
> procedure and former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten
> in past, but you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
>
> I would like to start talk about it a bit (I suggest incubator mailing
> list), prepared wiki page (with confusing name):
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/5-star-rating
>
> Scope: to re-new OSGeo Labs, make the incubation process easier for all of
> us, with more little steps (except for one big). Projects could flow
> between the steps "up" and "down", related to their current living phase.
>
> I hope, this would help to the community to get oriented, would allow more
> projects to join in. Work for incubation committee and mentors could be
> even less (some projects will remain in beta). It's also related to the
> "certification" topic (even not people, but software).
>
> Jachym
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20150216/0447af7b/attachment.html>