[Incubator] Fwd: gvSIG project graduation - motion

Manuel Madrid mmadrid at gvsig.com
Thu Oct 29 03:04:07 PDT 2015


Hi Jeroen,

Thank you for these so encouraging words. Thank you also for your 
support at the beginning of the incubation.

Kind regards,
Manuel.

On 29/10/15 10:14, Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
> Dear gvSIG community,
> +1 from me for incubating gvSIG.
> It has been a long process to which I was able to contribute a little 
> bit at the start. I'm very happy to see the process has now come to a 
> successful end! Congratulations and welcome as an incubated OSGeo 
> project! gvSIG is a real community project with lots of great 
> functionality and great people dedicating effort to it.
> Cheers,
> Jeroen
>
> Op 28 okt. 2015 om 23:46 heeft "bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com 
> <mailto:bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com>" 
> <bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com 
> <mailto:bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Congratulations!
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Incubator <incubator-bounces at lists.osgeo.org 
>>> <mailto:incubator-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>> on behalf of Jody 
>>> Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com <mailto:jody.garnett at gmail.com>>
>>> Date: Wednesday, 28 October 2015 14:57
>>> To: Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com 
>>> <mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>>
>>> Cc: Incubator <Incubator at lists.osgeo.org 
>>> <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>> Subject: Re: [Incubator] gvSIG project graduation - motion
>>>
>>>     +1 thanks for all the hard work
>>>
>>>     --
>>>     Jody Garnett
>>>
>>>     On 27 October 2015 at 11:26, Jeff McKenna
>>>     <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
>>>     <mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         I also believe that gvSIG is ready to graduate (from
>>>         reviewing the checklist at
>>>         http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GvSIG_Incubation_Checklist). Can
>>>         you please update the motion to include the name of the
>>>         Project Officer from gvSIG (who reports to the OSGeo
>>>         board)?  Thanks.
>>>
>>>         +1
>>>
>>>
>>>         -jeff
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         On 2015-10-27 1:53 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>
>>>             Hi incubation committee,
>>>             With the latest updates to gvSIG's docs about decision
>>>             making [1]
>>>             updated, I believe gvSIG is ready for graduation, as
>>>             requested by
>>>             Dimitris (OSGeo graduation mentor) below.
>>>
>>>             I propose that gvSIG is officially passes the OSGeo
>>>             Graduation process
>>>             and is accepted as an OSGeo project into graduation.
>>>             +1 Cameron
>>>
>>>             [1]
>>>             http://docs.gvsig.org/plone/projects/gvsig-desktop/docs/about-technical-decisions/
>>>
>>>
>>>             On 27/10/2015 2:50 am, Dimitris Kotzinos wrote:
>>>
>>>                 Dear all,
>>>
>>>                 I think that this is a good time for me as the
>>>                 mentor of the gvSIG
>>>                 project to recap the discussion in an effort to move
>>>                 things forward.
>>>                 Before that I would like to thank all the members of
>>>                 the committee for
>>>                 the highly constructive comments and the members of
>>>                 the gvSIG Community
>>>                 (especially Alvaro and Manuel that were the voices)
>>>                 for the very prompt
>>>                 and also constructive responses that show a great
>>>                 level of dedication in
>>>                 the graduation process.
>>>                 So I feel that the gvSIG community is demonstrating
>>>                 also through the
>>>                 graduation process its strength and commitment. I
>>>                 think that there were
>>>                 not really severe pending issues that would prohibit
>>>                 the project from
>>>                 graduating, while various comments - like the
>>>                 management process and the
>>>                 TSC functioning - demonstrated that on the one hand
>>>                 there is always room
>>>                 for improvement and on the other hand the community
>>>                 has already strong
>>>                 processes in place. We might not all agree 100% of
>>>                 all the processes but
>>>                 in my review of those (and I had long discussions
>>>                 with the gvSIG people
>>>                 before suggesting the project for graduation) I find
>>>                 that the processes
>>>                 are institutionalized and observed with a
>>>                 professional quality. The
>>>                 gvSIG community offers the unique experience for an
>>>                 OSGEO project to be
>>>                 managed by a legal entity. Moreover, the gvSIG
>>>                 community is healthy and
>>>                 spans 4 continents and carries information in
>>>                 different languages and in
>>>                 different places. I suspect that graduation gave
>>>                 them a good incentive
>>>                 to clarify and update their documented functions.
>>>
>>>                 So since we started the graduation process back in
>>>                 July (almost now 3
>>>                 months ago) I would like to ask teh Committee
>>>                 members to try to honor
>>>                 their request that we have some results shortly
>>>                 enough, in time for
>>>                 their next gvSIG Conference. Personally I do not see
>>>                 any blocking factor
>>>                 but if it is let's try to communicate it to them as
>>>                 fast as possible.
>>>                 So I would like to kindly ask Jody, as the chair,
>>>                 that if he feels that
>>>                 there are no blockong issues to move the vote forward.
>>>
>>>                 Again from my side I am available to facilitate the
>>>                 process as much,
>>>                 although as you saw so far I am letting the
>>>                 community deal with all
>>>                 requests posted here.
>>>                 So please as a Committee let's follow up on this.
>>>
>>>                 Best regards,
>>>
>>>                 Dimitris
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Incubator mailing list
>>>         Incubator at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Incubator mailing list
>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>> _______________________________________________
>> Incubator mailing list
>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20151029/375bc2f0/attachment.html>


More information about the Incubator mailing list