[Incubator] Considering Portable GIS as an OSGeo community project

Sun Nov 12 05:42:14 PST 2017

Hi Jody and the rest of the Incubation Committee

I've been through the Portable GIS repository (
https://gitlab.com/archaeogeek/portable-gis) and added license headers to
each file that I have added or changed (where appropriate in the latter
case). Unless anyone spots anything I've missed, I think I've met the
requirements for the GPLv3 license now. It's been a learning experience!

I think I'm now ready for you guys to decide whether or not to accept
Portable GIS as a community project, although again if there's anything I
have missed or need to resolve, please don't hesitate to ask.

Thanks

Jo

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I hear you, ... okay cheering for you on this end!
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 17 October 2017 at 07:40, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jody,
>>
>> Sure- I thought I probably had some more work to do adding the license
>> header to all the files, which I haven't quite found time to do yet!
>>
>> Jo
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jo with your permission I would like to put a motion before the
>>> incubation committee, you have been more than kind adding the files we
>>> requested, and we managed to find some things to work on in your codebase
>>> which is a great result.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>>> On 7 September 2017 at 07:02, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We actually found that adding the license headers is not strictly
>>>> required these days - but wise so people do not accidentally copy things
>>>> without knowing what license is around. But there is no legal need to have
>>>> the header with a constantly updated copyright etc...
>>>>
>>>> For more information see here:
>>>> - GeoTools: GeoTools Header Policy Updated
>>>> <https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj_wv6BnpPWAhUS82MKHZrPC5EQFggoMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgeotoolsnews.blogspot.com%2F2016%2F06%2Fgeotools-header-policy-updated.html&usg=AFQjCNHWd3sOZ_u5dEyw7-5B_VOrLzg8DA>
>>>>
>>>> We actually had to go to osgeo legal council and figure that stuff out,
>>>> apparently all our header maintenance traditions predate a treaty and are
>>>> left over from the 80s.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>
>>>> On 7 September 2017 at 03:04, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jody,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for these suggestions. I'm in the middle of implementing the
>>>>> changes you've suggested- I've updated the license and included a section
>>>>> in the contributors document about GPLv3. I think the other thing I need to
>>>>> do is add the license header to all my batch files, which I will start
>>>>> working on asap.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks good Jo, I will be happy to make the motion in a bit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like the friendly tone for CONTRIBUTING.md file, can I recommend
>>>>>> making a note somewhere in there that people should contribute their
>>>>>> changes to the project using a GPL3 license.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sometimes groups like Apache like to have a seperate license for
>>>>>> contributions that is different from the license used for distribution.
>>>>>> GPL3 tends to serve both these needs - but your contributors should be
>>>>>> really clear they are providing the project the code / fix / change with a
>>>>>> GPL license so there are no tears later. One trick I use to double check
>>>>>> consent is to ask these pull requests to include adding their name to the a
>>>>>> CONTRIBUTORS list in the documentation - both so I can credit them in
>>>>>> release notes and have a list of participants.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It also looks like your LICENSE file is just the header, rather than
>>>>>> a full GPL license.  For complete text see:
>>>>>> - https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
>>>>>> - https://github.com/IQAndreas/markdown-licenses
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 28 August 2017 at 10:02, Jo Cook <jocook at astuntechnology.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've added a contributing guidelines page and moved the license and
>>>>>>> changelog to the root of the portable gis repository at
>>>>>>> https://gitlab.com/archaeogeek/portable-gis. Does it all look OK?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks to everyone who has offered to assist with Portable GIS- it's
>>>>>>> really appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Landon Blake <
>>>>>>> sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I can help Jo with set-up as a community project, let me know.
>>>>>>>> I'm a Windows user...so I can help with the testing of releases. I'd also
>>>>>>>> be interested in learning more about how this works. :]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Landon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Jo Cook <
>>>>>>>> jocook at astuntechnology.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There's no relationship as such between Portable GIS and OSGeo4W-
>>>>>>>>> they are really complimentary projects with different objectives. The way I
>>>>>>>>> see it, Portable GIS provides a portable (hence the name) set of open
>>>>>>>>> source geospatial tools that don't require installation and can be taken
>>>>>>>>> from windows computer to windows computer on a USB stick,compared to
>>>>>>>>> OSGeo4W, which provides a streamlined way of installing the tools on a
>>>>>>>>> machine. They have some packages in common, but not all (I include
>>>>>>>>> PostgreSQL/PostGIS and GeoServer alongside QGIS, Mapserver etc, but
>>>>>>>>> otherwise a much more limited set of tools than OSGeo4W due to space
>>>>>>>>> considerations).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When OSGeo4W first came out (believe it or not, Portable GIS
>>>>>>>>> predates it) there was some discussion about the possible relationship
>>>>>>>>> between the two packages at that point, but like I say, they have different
>>>>>>>>> objectives and exist in harmony together.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hope that clears things up- I'll add some disambiguation to the
>>>>>>>>> readme and website next time I do an update!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Jeffrey Johnson <
>>>>>>>>> ortelius at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just curious about the relationship to osgeo4w
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Cameron Shorter
>>>>>>>>>> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> > Hi Jo,
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > I'm really excited to see you pushing Portable GIS forward. I
>>>>>>>>>> think that
>>>>>>>>>> > having a windows based OSGeo distribution is a great complement
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> > OSGeo-Live, as OSGeo-Live is tied into (and limited to) being a
>>>>>>>>>> linux
>>>>>>>>>> > distribution.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > I also see potential for collaboration between OSGeo-Live and
>>>>>>>>>> Portable GIS.
>>>>>>>>>> > Eg, the OSGeo-Live Project Overviews could note whether the
>>>>>>>>>> project is
>>>>>>>>>> > available on Portable GIS.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > We could also potentially align OSGeo-Live and Portable GIS
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> > schedules (which would help with aligning documentation).
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Re packaging, have you considered building with cygwin (which
>>>>>>>>>> is Open
>>>>>>>>>> > Source)?
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > I'm happy to answer questions about license. While I'm not a
>>>>>>>>>> lawyer, I have
>>>>>>>>>> > been involved in plenty of licensing selection discussions,
>>>>>>>>>> including for
>>>>>>>>>> > OSGeo-Live.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Re Portable GIS licensing, I assume your build tools are not
>>>>>>>>>> embedded in the
>>>>>>>>>> > final Portable GIS software distribution? That would mean that
>>>>>>>>>> the final
>>>>>>>>>> > software distribution does not inherit to the license of the
>>>>>>>>>> build tools. So
>>>>>>>>>> > I suspect you should be ok to select what ever license you
>>>>>>>>>> choose for the
>>>>>>>>>> > build tools. That is how we have approached the OSGeo-Live
>>>>>>>>>> build scripts,
>>>>>>>>>> > which are LGPL. (Documentation is licensed under CC-By for
>>>>>>>>>> Project Overviews
>>>>>>>>>> > and CC-By-SA for Quickstarts).
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Warm regards, Cameron
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > On 24/8/17 1:22 am, Jo Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Hi Jody and list,
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Having had a bit of a think about licensing, I had previously
>>>>>>>>>> chosen GPLv3
>>>>>>>>>> > *for my components alone* and I think I'm happy with that. As
>>>>>>>>>> far as I can
>>>>>>>>>> > tell, I can license my modifications alone with GPLv3
>>>>>>>>>> regardless of what the
>>>>>>>>>> > software projects themselves are. I've had a look at how OSGeo
>>>>>>>>>> Live works,
>>>>>>>>>> > but that doesn't help much (https://live.osgeo.org/en/cop
>>>>>>>>>> yright.html). Is
>>>>>>>>>> > there anyone on the list who could help me out with this-
>>>>>>>>>> basically to
>>>>>>>>>> > confirm or deny?
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Jo
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Jo Cook <
>>>>>>>>>> jocook at astuntechnology.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Hi Jody,
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> That all sounds really encouraging and yes I'd be happy to go
>>>>>>>>>> through the
>>>>>>>>>> >> process with you and the team. We (Astun) potentially have
>>>>>>>>>> another project
>>>>>>>>>> >> that we'd like to submit for consideration too, and I'll be in
>>>>>>>>>> touch
>>>>>>>>>> >> separately about that one.
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Regarding autoit, no you don't need to purchase anything to
>>>>>>>>>> use it. Having
>>>>>>>>>> >> thought about this in some more detail, I think I will try to
>>>>>>>>>> move away from
>>>>>>>>>> >> that dependency and try to find an open source alternative but
>>>>>>>>>> that will
>>>>>>>>>> >> obviously take some time to work through, so it would be good
>>>>>>>>>> if we could
>>>>>>>>>> >> start working through the process of becoming a community
>>>>>>>>>> project while that
>>>>>>>>>> >> is ongoing.
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> I'll make some tweaks to the repository to make sure that the
>>>>>>>>>> various docs
>>>>>>>>>> >> are easy to find, and then maybe come back to you when that's
>>>>>>>>>> ready. I want
>>>>>>>>>> >> to think a little about whether I'm using the most appropriate
>>>>>>>>>> license too.
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Jo
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Jody Garnett <
>>>>>>>>>> jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> Glad to hear from you Jo!
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> Although the "OSGeo community" initiative was started last
>>>>>>>>>> year, we have
>>>>>>>>>> >>> not had a chance to try it out yet (perhaps due to lack of
>>>>>>>>>> publicity). If
>>>>>>>>>> >>> you are patient with us we would enjoy going through this
>>>>>>>>>> process with you,
>>>>>>>>>> >>> and revising our notes as we go.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> The wiki OSGeo Community Projects page has the following
>>>>>>>>>> recipe:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> If your project would like to join OSGeo the technology
>>>>>>>>>> initiative asks:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> That your project is geospatial (or directly supports
>>>>>>>>>> geospatial
>>>>>>>>>> >>> applications);
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> Data & doc projects would of course need an appropriate data
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>> >>> documentation license
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> That your project is open source
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> Uses an OSI approved open source license
>>>>>>>>>> >>> That you know where your source code came from, and that care
>>>>>>>>>> is taken
>>>>>>>>>> >>> when accepting external contributions
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> Participatory (accepts pull-requests)
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> Along with a few notes on how we can quickly check the
>>>>>>>>>> LICENSE,
>>>>>>>>>> >>> CONTRIBUTING, README files.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> autoit
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> Your question about autoit is tricky, it is freely
>>>>>>>>>> distributable - so not
>>>>>>>>>> >>> a barrier to use. We are actually in a similar spot for the
>>>>>>>>>> GeoTools and
>>>>>>>>>> >>> GeoServer projects. When they were first created Java was not
>>>>>>>>>> open source so
>>>>>>>>>> >>> there were some very heated discussions with the gvSig team
>>>>>>>>>> on if you could
>>>>>>>>>> >>> ever make a free software solution using Java.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> But we are an open source software foundation (not at a free
>>>>>>>>>> software
>>>>>>>>>> >>> foundation) allowing GeoTools, GeoServer .. and by extension
>>>>>>>>>> autoit.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> This question of Java still troubles us, while Java is now
>>>>>>>>>> open source,
>>>>>>>>>> >>> the image processing library that was included in Java is
>>>>>>>>>> still only free to
>>>>>>>>>> >>> distribute. This causes problems for the OSGeo Live and uDig
>>>>>>>>>> projects.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> I would be concerned though if people need to purchase autoit
>>>>>>>>>> in order to
>>>>>>>>>> >>> work on your project? There is a slight difference between
>>>>>>>>>> being required to
>>>>>>>>>> >>> purchase a tool, and optionally using a tool. For GeoTools we
>>>>>>>>>> can "work
>>>>>>>>>> >>> with" the Oracle Database (if user installs the right jars
>>>>>>>>>> they have
>>>>>>>>>> >>> downloaded from Oracle) or ArcSDE (if the user installs the
>>>>>>>>>> right jars they
>>>>>>>>>> >>> have purchased from ESRI). However if a contributor is not in
>>>>>>>>>> possession of
>>>>>>>>>> >>> these artifacts they can still work on the project as a whole.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> --
>>>>>>>>>> >>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>> On 22 August 2017 at 06:25, Jo Cook <
>>>>>>>>>> jocook at astuntechnology.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Hi Incubator List,
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> As you may or may not know, I have been running a small
>>>>>>>>>> project called
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Portable GIS (GIS on a USB stick for Windows) for a number
>>>>>>>>>> of years. The
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> basic premise is to provide a no-install, no-config version
>>>>>>>>>> of many of the
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> common open source GIS projects on a USB stick.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Recently I built a website for the project (portablegis.xyz)
>>>>>>>>>> and I'm
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> working through the process of documenting and publishing
>>>>>>>>>> all the
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> configuration changes that need to be made to make projects
>>>>>>>>>> portable (mainly
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> batch files to be honest). This also includes the source
>>>>>>>>>> code for building
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> the menu and installer files.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> This is on Gitlab at https://gitlab.com/archaeogeek
>>>>>>>>>> /portable-gis so that
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> I can now start accepting contributions. Note that this
>>>>>>>>>> repository does not
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> contain the actual source code for the projects such as
>>>>>>>>>> QGIS, it just
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> contains the files that need to be adjusted to make it work
>>>>>>>>>> portably.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> One of my colleagues has suggested that Portable GIS could
>>>>>>>>>> be an OSGeo
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Community Project, so here I am, asking about it :-)
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> My main concern is that autoit, which I used for building
>>>>>>>>>> the menu, is
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> freeware rather than opensource (see
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.autoitscript.com/site/ and
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> specifically https://www.autoitscript.com/a
>>>>>>>>>> utoit3/docs/license.htm). My gut
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> feeling is that this bars Portable GIS from being truly open
>>>>>>>>>> source, and
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> hence not suitable for being an OSGeo Community Project.
>>>>>>>>>> Would that be
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> correct?
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> If this was the only bar to entry, I could certainly look at
>>>>>>>>>> alternative
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> options for building the menu.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Jo
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Jo Cook
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street,
>>>>>>>>>> Epsom, Surrey,
>>>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+%0D+%3E%3E%3E%3E+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> KT18 7RL, UK
>>>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+%0D+%3E%3E%3E%3E+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 w: astuntechnology.com twitter:@astuntech
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and
>>>>>>>>>> Wales.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey,
>>>>>>>>>> KT19 8LN
>>>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>>>> VAT no.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> 864201149.
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>>>>>> >> Jo Cook
>>>>>>>>>> >> t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>> > Jo Cook
>>>>>>>>>> > t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>> > Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom,
>>>>>>>>>> Surrey, KT18
>>>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+%0D+%3E+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>>>> > 7RL, UK
>>>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+%0D+%3E+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>>>> > t:+44 1372 744 009 w: astuntechnology.com twitter:@astuntech
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>>>>>>> > GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>>>>>>> > Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and
>>>>>>>>>> Wales.
>>>>>>>>>> > Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19
>>>>>>>>>> 8LN
>>>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>>>> VAT no.
>>>>>>>>>> > 864201149.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> > Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> > Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>> > Cameron Shorter
>>>>>>>>>> > M +61 419 142 254
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> > Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> > Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> *Jo Cook*
>>>>>>>>> t:+44 7930 524 155 <+44%207930%20524155>/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom,
>>>>>>>>> Surrey, KT18 7RL, UK
>>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 <+44%201372%20744009> w: astuntechnology.com
>>>>>>>>> twitter:@astuntech <https://twitter.com/astuntech>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
>>>>>>>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
>>>>>>>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>>>>>> <http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>>>>>>>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>>>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>>> VAT no. 864201149.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Landon
>>>>>>>> "Homemade cookies. Hmmmmmmmmmm!"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Web: www.landonblake.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/landonblake
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LandonBlake
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/scott.l.blake.3
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/landon_blake/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Jo Cook*
>>>>>>> t:+44 7930 524 155 <+44%207930%20524155>/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom,
>>>>>>> Surrey, KT18 7RL, UK
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 <+44%201372%20744009> w: astuntechnology.com
>>>>>>> twitter:@astuntech <https://twitter.com/astuntech>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
>>>>>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
>>>>>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>>>> <http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>>>>>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>> VAT no. 864201149.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Jo Cook*
>>>>> t:+44 7930 524 155 <+44%207930%20524155>/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom, Surrey,
>>>>> KT18 7RL, UK
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>
>>>>> t:+44 1372 744 009 <+44%201372%20744009> w: astuntechnology.com
>>>>> twitter:@astuntech <https://twitter.com/astuntech>
>>>>>
>>>>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
>>>>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>>>>> <https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
>>>>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>>>>> <http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>
>>>>>
>>>>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>>>>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>> VAT no. 864201149.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Jo Cook*
>> t:+44 7930 524 155 <+44%207930%20524155>/twitter:@archaeogeek
>>
>>
>> --
>> Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom, Surrey,
>> KT18 7RL, UK
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=17+West+Street,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT18+7RL,+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>
>> t:+44 1372 744 009 <+44%201372%20744009> w: astuntechnology.com twitter:
>> @astuntech <https://twitter.com/astuntech>
>>
>> iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform
>> <https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
>> GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training
>> <https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
>> Helpdesk and customer portal
>> <http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>
>>
>> Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales.
>> Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=120+Manor+Green+Road,+Epsom,+Surrey,+KT19+8LN&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> VAT no. 864201149.
>>
>
>

-- 
*Jo Cook*
t:+44 7930 524 155/twitter:@archaeogeek
Please note that currently I do not work on Friday afternoons. For urgent
responses at that time, please visit support.astuntechnology.com or phone
our office on 01372 744009

-- 
--
Astun Technology Ltd, The Coach House, 17 West Street, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 
7RL, UK 
t:+44 1372 744 009 w: astuntechnology.com twitter:@astuntech 
<https://twitter.com/astuntech>

iShare - enterprise geographic intelligence platform 
<https://astuntechnology.com/ishare/>
GeoServer, PostGIS and QGIS training 
<https://astuntechnology.com/services/#training>
Helpdesk and customer portal 
<http://support.astuntechnology.com/support/login>

Company registration no. 5410695. Registered in England and Wales. 
Registered office: 120 Manor Green Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8LN VAT no. 
864201149.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20171112/feec682d/attachment-0001.html>