[Incubator] motion: qfield recommendation for osgeo community project initiative

Nick Bearman nick at nickbearman.com
Thu Mar 26 08:50:45 PDT 2026


So far we have 1 votes. Probably because I put a lot of preamble before 
the voting, sorry!

We need 7 to pass, so please vote before the deadline, Thurs 2nd April.

Or ask questions if you have any!

Thanks,
Nick.

Therefore I propose to make a motion to accept QField as an OSGeo 
Community Project

The motion is held open for two weeks until Thursday 2 April and
requires at least 50% quorum from the following Committee Members:


      - Angelos Tzotsos
      - Arnulf Christl
      - Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques
      - Brian M Hamlin
      - Daniel Morissette
      - Dimitris Kotzinos
      - Frank Warmerdam
      - Jo Cook
      - Jody Garnett
      - Michael Smith +1
      - Nick Bearman +1
      - Regina Obe
      - Steve Lime +1
      - Tom Kralidis +1

On 19/03/2026 16:02, Nick Bearman via Incubator wrote:
>
> All of the links and details are still valid.
>
> From 9th May 2023 
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2023-May/004656.html
>
>     This motion did not pass in the allocated time. I would like to ask
>     another volunteer to review.
>
>     We had one question come up during voting on license compatibility
>     that is
>     interesting but may not be suitable for public discussion.
>
>     Jody
>
> The licensing question was: 
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2023-April/004648.html
>
>     I don't get to vote, but I have had a question about qfield for a long
>     time that I have never seen an answer for. I am 99% sure I have asked
>     about it on one of the qgis lists in the past.
>
>     The license for qgis is GPL2, and qfield has the same license. qfield
>     appears to contain qgis code. That's all fine.
>
>     The android app is distributed under GPL2 presumably, but I don't see
>     that mentioned in the google play store. That's a minor issue and
>     easily fixed, assuming that there aren't proprietary android libraries
>     (e.g. Google Play services) bundled in.
>
>     The iOS app is presumably also GPL2, but as I understand it,
>     that's not
>     allowed in the apple app store, and the Apple app store's terms
>     prohibit
>     redistribution of the app one obtains, which is incompatible with
>     GPL2.
>     Often software that was Free before it goes into the Apple app
>     store has
>     a special license from the copyright holders to be able to be
>     distributed under the non-Free license required by Apple. But with
>     code
>     from qgis -- since it has no such exception -- I don't understand how
>     this is working.
>
>     Thus, I don't understand the licensing situation. My specific
>     questions:
>
>     Is the license for qfield straight GPL2, as the repo indicates, or
>     something else?
>
>     Does qfield contain qgis code, such that it's a derived work?
>
>     If so, is qgis straight GPL2?
>
>     Is the Android binary under GPL2, with only Free software as sources?
>
>     Is the iOS binary on gitub under GPL2, with only Free software as
>     sources?
>
>     How is the iOS binary being distributed in the Apple app store?
>
>     Thanks,
>     Greg
>
> I don't know the details of the licensing question, or whether this is 
> still valid.
>
> Therefore I propose to make a motion to accept QField as an OSGeo 
> Community Project
>
> The motion is held open for two weeks until Thursday 2 April and
> requires at least 50% quorum from the following Committee Members:
>
> |- Angelos Tzotsos - Arnulf Christl - Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques - Brian 
> M Hamlin - Daniel Morissette - Dimitris Kotzinos - Frank Warmerdam - 
> Jo Cook - Jody Garnett - Michael Smith - Nick Bearman +1 - Regina Obe 
> - Steve Lime - Tom Kralidis |
>
> I am happy with this, and am starting with a +1
>
> Thanks
> Nick.
>
>
> On 27/01/2026 17:46, Angelos Tzotsos via Incubator wrote:
>> https://gitea.osgeo.org/osgeo/projects-support/issues/9
>>
>> On 4/21/23 20:34, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>> I would like to make a motion:
>>>     Recommending QField for the osgeo community project program.
>>>
>>> The motion is held open for two weeks, until May 5th 2023.
>>>
>>>     - Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques
>>>     - Arnulf Christl
>>>     - Jo Cook
>>>     - Jody Garnett +1 (initial motion)
>>>     - Dimitris Kotzinos
>>>     - Tom Kralidis
>>>     - Michael Smith
>>>     - Steve Lime
>>>     - Daniel Morissette
>>>     - Frank Warmerdam
>>>     - Angelos Tzotsos
>>>
>>>
>>> Checking the project against our requirements
>>> <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Incubation_Committee#Step_2:_Join_Community_Projects_Program> 
>>>
>>> :
>>>
>>> 1. Be geospatial
>>> - Confirm by checking README or project description
>>> - project page on the osgeo website
>>> - We ask projects have some user documentation, for example an OSGeo 
>>> Live
>>> quickstart
>>>
>>> Most of this was checked for website requirements. There is nice user
>>> documentation (https://docs.qfield.org/get-started/).
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. Have a free license or an open source license.
>>> - The license must be OSI approved
>>> - We ask that the project team check the file headers and double 
>>> check the
>>> license has been appropriately applied
>>>
>>> GPL2 is provided in docs 
>>> (https://docs.qfield.org/get-started/license/) and
>>> source code (https://github.com/opengisch/QField/blob/master/LICENSE).
>>>
>>> The team has automated check that license is applied (
>>> https://github.com/opengisch/QField/blob/master/scripts/licensecheck.pl) 
>>>
>>> which is really cool.
>>>
>>> 3. Welcome participation and new contributors.
>>> - We look for a clear contribution policy
>>> - We ask that the project demonstrate collaboration, perhaps with a 
>>> history
>>> of bug report or pull requests
>>> - Projects are required to have a code of conduct
>>>
>>> Contribution policy (
>>> https://github.com/opengisch/QField/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md),
>>> collaboration (https://github.com/opengisch/QField/pulls?q=is%3Apr), 
>>> and
>>> code of conduct (
>>> https://github.com/opengisch/QField/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) all
>>> seem in order.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Incubator mailing list
>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>
>>
> -- 
> Nick Bearman
> +44 (0) 7717745715
> nick at nickbearman.com
>
> Please let me know if I can make any adjustments related to disability or neurodivergence to improve how we interact.
>
> Due to my own life/work balance, you may get emails from me outside of normal working hours. Please do not feel any pressure to respond outside of your own working pattern.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Incubator mailing list
> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator

-- 
Nick Bearman
+44 (0) 7717745715
nick at nickbearman.com

Please let me know if I can make any adjustments related to disability or neurodivergence to improve how we interact.

Due to my own life/work balance, you may get emails from me outside of normal working hours. Please do not feel any pressure to respond outside of your own working pattern.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/attachments/20260326/c8994309/attachment.htm>


More information about the Incubator mailing list