[Java-collab] So how is this list doing? Are we on topic...

[Justin Deoliveira]

I admit that i have not been following discussion very intently so take 
this with a grain of salt... but from what I can tell the flavor of this 
list is very "geoapi-ish". I was hoping this list might turn into more 
of a "ok, we all have code, how do we work together and come up with 
ways to merge / collaborate".

My 2c.

-Justin


Jody Garnett wrote:
> So how are we doing for staying on topic? A couple things have been 
> really successful:
> - introductions all around
> - learning about new work (and duplicated work)
> 
> And a couple tracks (on and off list) where we could improve:
> - yesterday I was sorting out a compatibility problem between uDig and 
> Deegree; and signing up to deegree-devel and posting follow up email on 
> udig-devel etc...
> - The ISO19115/ISO19111 discussion is starting to span multiple lists - 
> CCing java-collab; and geoserver-devel; and geotools-devel
> 
> It would save me time and effort to have java-collab as a venue for 
> working out compatibility problems; would that be a good use of this list?
> I think the ISO19115/ISO1911 discussion started off okay; but as the 
> discussion got specific, and importantly additional lists were CCed, it 
> was hard for others to take part.
> 
> Please note if you CC a developer list (other than java-collab) others 
> will not smoothly be able to reply to the message; and it becomes a pain 
> for all involved.
> Jody
> _______________________________________________
> Java-collab mailing list
> Java-collab at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/java-collab
> 
> !DSPAM:4007,48458d97156354901796417!
> 


-- 
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
jdeolive at openplans.org