[Lexicon] Glossary pilot kickoff meeting

[Cameron Shorter]

Thanks for your detailed feedback Erik.
You've provided a broad range of suggestions in the attached word document,
which I'd love to see archived (and able to be searched later). Would you
mind sending a version again in plain text.
I'm hopeful that you can talk to this in our meeting. Would you be up to
adding a slide to our slide deck:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1fZxe4YRXKfYU5rAjk5GPRNyDRbwqT9NV406jjX8nB4k/edit#slide=id.p
Unfortunately we have lots to cover, and everyone is only going to get 2 to
3 mins. I realize you have a lot more to say, which will need to spill out
into project conversations.

With regards to project focus - this is going to be set by those who come
into this pilot.
I expect OGC/ISO folks on this list will be better positioned to respond to
the specifics of your OGC/ISO comments.

Erik,
I'll be interested to hear your thoughts on the OSGeo Glossary use case.
How can we help a small volunteer OSGeo project manage their small list of
project specific terms, alongside a subset of OGC terms which they are
interested in? I don't think this use case is covered within your suggested
approach? Note that the OSGeo project has minimal access to money,
infrastructure, or expertise.


On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 08:29, Erik Stubkjær <est at plan.aau.dk> wrote:

> Dear Cameron and discussion participants, (sorry, please disregard
> previous mail and attachment)
>
>
>
> Thanks for the opportunity to join. I registered for the timeslot 2.
>
>
>
> I belong to the group of ‘Standards people and information modellers
> (associated with ISO standards and the Open Geospatial Consortium)’.
>
> I am professor emeritus (Cadastre and Land Law, Aalborg University,
> Denmark) and co-author with Doç. Dr.
>
> Volkan ÇAĞDAŞ, Yildiz Technical University, Turkey, of the Cadastre and
> Land Administration Thesaurus (CaLAThe).
>
>
>
> As of December 2019, CaLAThe comprises about 250 terms. Version 4
> introduction reads that ‘The recording of definitions was supported by the
> availability of the Geolexica online glossary for geographic information
> technology from ISO/TC 211 Geographic information/Geomatics, as well as the
> Bartoc Skosmos tool.’ CaLAThe is hosted at the OGC Definitions Server
> <https://www.opengis.net/def/CaLAThe/4.0/> and at BARTOC
> <http://bartoc-skosmos.unibas.ch/CaLAThe/en/>, and cross-referenced with
> LandVoc <https://www.landvoc.org/>.
>
>
>
> In the attached note, I motivate that the Project manifesto could reflect
> more precisely on the input already available, and among others propose
> that we should suggest that the ISO and the OGC establishes a mandatory
> review of terms and definitions as part the systematic standard review
> process.
>
>
>
> Looking forward to further exchanges
>
> Best regards
>
> Erik
>


-- 
Cameron Shorter
Technical Writer, Google
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/lexicon/attachments/20200824/dc81bb29/attachment.html>