[Lexicon] FW: Glossary meeting tomorrow

[Rob Atkinson]

Thanks Erik.

IMHO the end goal is to have the CaLAThe entries directly link to the
underlying definitions using Linked Data - i.e. the ability to follow a URI
reference...

at the moment citations are embedded text fragments - this is not

at OGC we are looking to provide the right targets (URIs) for direct
citation by link.

a short term option is for you to create a proxy (temporary object) for the
things you most need and link to these, or to work with LADM and LandInfra
to arrange canonical OWL representations of these standards using URIs that
resolve. (OGC is easy - ISO will take more work but the OSGeo Glossary
project is about achieving the sort of interoperability required here.

The Use Case from the glossary perspective is to collate relevant
references from published standards into a local domain (such as the OsGeo
software implementation space) without losing the links back to those
standards, and the standards to be interlinked with all the resources
needed to understand and use them. Its a big paradigm shift, but we are
making progress.

Cheers


*Rob AtkinsonSenior Research Engineer | Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)*
Mobile: 61-419-202-973
ratkinson at ogc.org <JFath at ogc.org> | ogc.org


*Sign up for OGC News*
<https://ogc.us4.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=704e02f81107a6caab1568067&id=4e4528fd9d>

<https://www.ogc.org/webinars>




On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:00 AM Erik Stubkjær <est at plan.aau.dk> wrote:

> Rob, Gobe,
>
>
>
> I have been silent for a while, first because of planned summer holidays,
> next because my wife fell and broke her arm, which extended my domestic
> duties.
>
>
>
> In my mail of June 18, I noted ‘I did not manage to make an adequate
> one-sentence comment to Rob’s presentation. When Ingo’s
> Innovation-presentation is available, I’ll comment on both’
>
> I have not been able to dig up Ingo’s presentation, and you have had a lot
> of other duties.
>
>
>
> As far as I understand, Rob’s presentation addresses the formalism needed
> to perform compliance tests (here compliance with LandInfra/InfraGML
> requirements) automatically. This I consider an effort within the wider OGC
> API endeavor. I am not able to identify development within the semantic
> domain, or see how the presented effort relates to the ‘integrating
> glossaries’-issue, mentioned below
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Erik
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lexicon <lexicon-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> *On Behalf Of *Cameron
> Shorter
> *Sent:* 12. juli 2021 09:59
> *To:* lexicon <lexicon at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Cc:* Dr. Michael Jastram <michael.jastram at formalmind.com>
> *Subject:* [Lexicon] Glossary meeting tomorrow
>
>
>
> Folks, a reminder that we have our fortnightly glossary meeting tomorrow.
> I hope you can make it.
>
>
>
> Agenda:
>
> * Rob, Ron: Anything to report on defining a glossary profile and
> integrating glossaries?
>
> * I'd like to introduce Michael Jastram, who has been developing a
> glossary browser plugin, and using IA to get glossary terms.
>
> * Any other business
>
>
>
> --
>
> Cameron Shorter
>
> Technical Writer, Google
>
>
>

-- 
 <https://www.ogc.org/webinars>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/lexicon/attachments/20210713/c5c0e093/attachment.html>