[Live-demo] Alternative to describing maturity with stars?

[Hamish]

 Cameron wrote:
We could specify maturity as a string, of maturity levels, with the
current maturity in bold, like:



Maturity: (mature | *established*
| stable | beta)



This still helps users distinguish between projects, without stars.

Would that address people's concerns?

Sounds good to me (although I don't really see the need to list the unused words; seems obvious).

I just couldn't see giving a project like GMT with 1000s of spottings in journals like Science and Nature a 2/5 == "stable" star rating and not have someone in the audience saying 'wtf?' ..

what would the difference between "mature" and "established" be? how about vs .stable?


Hamish


ps- the many fixes from the 4.0rc1 build seemed to have been quiet for a number of days, so time for the next one?

 



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/live-demo/attachments/20100711/41ba8a60/attachment.html