[Live-demo] Planing Roadmap in OSGeo Trac for Live Project

[Daniel Kastl]

I agree with what Frank and Angelos said.
It could be also a good idea to move the OSGeo Live project to its own SVN
repository and TRAC instance. Currently it uses the "osgeo" repository and
TRAC, but I think it would better fit into this list as a separate project:
https://trac.osgeo.org/
I don't know how difficult it is though to do the changes.

Daniel


On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 04/02/2012 12:42 PM, Frank Gasdorf wrote:
>
>> Hallo List,
>>
>> Is it possible to define several milestones for the osgeo live project
>> in Trac. IMHO its a good way to coordinate several activities and
>> committers. In addition we can use Milestones to write down release
>> notes and included tickets for bugs enhancements and tasks. An other
>> PRO is to the change to link bugs to the relevant released version.
>>
>> What do you think about defining a new Milestone 'OSGeo Live 6.0' and
>> a version 'OSGeo Live 5.5' right here :
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/**admin/ticket/versions<http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/versions>(maybe for the older
>> releases as well (5.0, 4.5))
>>
>> If anybody got bug reports or have other issues with the current or
>> prior release we could associate the bugs to the matching version.
>>
>> What do you think about such a management improvement? I could help
>> defining and managing such milestones. Properly we could plan a next
>> release on IRC and put relevant issues/tasks into the basket.
>>
>> What do you think about coordinate translations with such Trac-tasks
>> instead of an wiki-Page
>> (http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/**Talk:Live_GIS_Translate<http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Talk:Live_GIS_Translate>).
>> IMHO its quite
>> easy to assign tickets to myself and everybody have a clue whats in
>> the pipeline and who is working on. And properly who needs help to
>> finish tasks for an upcoming release.
>>
>> Feedback is warmly wellcome
>>
>> Cheers
>> Frank
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Live-demo mailing list
>> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/live-demo<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo>
>> http://live.osgeo.org
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/**Live_GIS_Disc<http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc>
>>
>>  Hi Frank,
>
> I agree that we should use Trac in more depth for our 6.0 development.
> We also have to clear old bug reports and associate them with the latest
> release, as you suggest.
>
> For the coordination of translations though I think the current tools
> serve us well, since each language is maintained by separate teams, so we
> do not need to put much details in Trac (this would require enough effort).
> If you just mean to track milestones for translations (eg Overviews
> completeness, Quickstart completeness, sync of each language with trunk
> english documents etc) then +1 from me.
>
> Cheers,
> Angelos
>
>
> --
> Angelos Tzotsos
> Remote Sensing Laboratory
> National Technical University of Athens
> http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Live-demo mailing list
> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/live-demo<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo>
> http://live.osgeo.org
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/**Live_GIS_Disc<http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc>
>



-- 
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
Web: http://georepublic.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/live-demo/attachments/20120402/df7ce8cf/attachment.html