[Live-demo] Re: Should 52 North WPS continue to be included on OSGeo-Live?

[Bastian Schäffer]

Hi Cameron,

Hamish is right, the "problem" is the external WFS. So, the WPS server is fine (and has not changed). The test requests you send contain a non working data link to an external WFS. 

How do you test if some server is working?
How can we change the 

Regards,
Bastian


Am 16.02.2012 um 23:04 schrieb Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com>:

> We have one week before we cut our final release of OSGeo-Live 5.5 (25 Feb), and the 52 North WPS is the only application left which doesn't work. If we can't get it working in the next couple of days, we are going to have to remove it from the next osgeolive release.
> 
> As yet, we haven't been able to connect with anyone from 52 North to discuss this.
> Can you please:
> 1. ASAP: Send a response to this email, confirming that someone in 52N has received this email.
> 
> 2. Within 24 hours: Note whether you wish 52 North WPS to be included on the next OSGeo-Live release.
> 
> 3. Within 3 days: Assuming we should keep 52N WPS, help us debug the issue and find a resolution.
> 
> We have an issue description here:
> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/859
> 
> You can usually find one of our osgeolive developers online at: irc://freenode.net#osgeolive
> And our email list is: live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> 
> -- 
> Cameron Shorter
> Geospatial Solutions Manager
> Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
> Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
> 
> Think Globally, Fix Locally
> Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
> http://www.lisasoft.com
> 
>