[Live-demo] Translations and Proj4 documentation

Wed Jun 14 11:29:39 PDT 2017

Hi Vicky,

I am not in the incubating list as a human being, but metacrs is :
http://www.osgeo.org/incubator

I'll have a look on pgRouting.

Regards,
Julien.

2017-06-14 3:02 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>:

> Hello Julien,
>
> Now about the documentation
> I see you've worked on your fork, these are the differences:
> is that correct?
> https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master
>
> I dont think you are incubating project (I dont see it in the list of
> incubating projects), so this might not apply.
>
> .. image:: ../../images/logos/OSGeo_incubation.png
>   :scale: 100 %
>   :alt: OSGeo Project
>   :align: right
>   :target: http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html
>
> 
> But I see you advanced a lot on the documentation 👍
> You might as well do the PR so that the other members of the team can
> give you feed back.
>
> Vicky.
> 
> PS, in pgRouting   the documentation is done in such a way, to make
> minimal changes in further releases of OSGeo Live.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Julien Moquet <moquet.julien at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Vicky,
>>
>> My fork is up to date regarding the overview and quickstart:
>> https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc
>>
>> Before making a pull request, I need to test it over the OsGeoLive-10.5
>> (on wednesday or thursday).
>>
>> Although, as I read the sources.list include in this version, I don't
>> really think the latest proj4 will be used.
>> The ubuntugis is used for that, and there is only the stable 4.8.0-3
>> proj4 release to be used.
>> See : http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu
>> /pool/main/p/proj/
>> and https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sourc
>> es.list.d/ubuntugis.list
>>
>> That's why I finally don't have to change the proj4 release on its
>> overview.
>> I only bypass the metacrs and stuff.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Julien.
>>
>>
>> 2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>:
>>
>>> Hi Julien, et all
>>> Maybe you can help me.
>>> It so happened that I sent another mail asking about what version to
>>> use, while reviewing today, I saw that I didn't send the mail to proj4.
>>> (my mail merge skills are not so good)
>>>
>>> So, here is the hand made mail:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot, we will be re-inserting each
>>> project into the OSGeo-Live baseline once someone from each project has
>>> replied to confirm that they have reviewed docs and verified the
>>> application works as expected.
>>>
>>> Can you please:
>>>  0. Reply by return email to confirm that you have recieved this email
>>> and that you are able to check docs within the next 2 weeks. (sooner would
>>> be better if you can)
>>>  1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is still accurate, or has been
>>> updated, (and version numbers are correct)
>>>  2. Reply to confirm you have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the
>>> previous 10.5 version is ok), and updated the quickstart where needed.
>>>  We understand that version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be installed on
>>> OSGeo-Live 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was installed on OSGeo-Live 10.5.)
>>> (all in one reply is ok)
>>>
>>> Full package status can be seen here:
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMl
>>> M8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150
>>>
>>> Key Milestones
>>> -------------------
>>> 18-Jun-2017    All docs reviewed and verified
>>> 21-Jun-2017    OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application versions
>>> installed - Beta stage)
>>> 24-Jul-2017    OSGeo-Live Final ISO
>>> 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston
>>>
>>> ... full schedule http://spreadsheets.google.com
>>> /ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter <
>>> cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Julien,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for offering to help with translations. I'm looping in Niko and
>>>> Vicky who are currently wrestling with trying to get transifex to work. If
>>>> you are familiar with it, you might be able to help them.
>>>>
>>>> Warm regards, Cameron
>>>>
>>>> On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been translated into other
>>>> languages, including proj4js, ..."
>>>> > Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ..
>>>>
>>>> I am fully agree too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can help on the proj4
>>>> French Translation pages.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Hi Evan,
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects together.
>>>>>
>>>>> > However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping
>>>>>
>>>>> > which is active?
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from
>>>>> OSGeo-Live
>>>>>
>>>>> > as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say
>>>>> "Proj4
>>>>>
>>>>> > has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, ..."
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> > Your thoughts are welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs :
>>>>>
>>>>> - proj4js: no opinion
>>>>>
>>>>> - cs-map: no-opinion
>>>>>
>>>>> - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in particular,
>>>>> mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a technical dependency
>>>>> that doesn't require to be visible from users.
>>>>>
>>>>> - proj4j: no opinion
>>>>>
>>>>> - spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. http://epsg.io/
>>>>> would be a possible replacement
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks exploring
>>>>> OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing proj.4 as a standalone
>>>>> project.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.spatialys.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cameron Shorter
>>>> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>>> Salzmannstraße 44,
>>> 81739 München, Germany
>>>
>>> Vicky Vergara
>>> Operations Research
>>>
>>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>>> Web: https://georepublic.info
>>>
>>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>>
>>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
> Salzmannstraße 44,
> 81739 München, Germany
>
> Vicky Vergara
> Operations Research
>
> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
> Web: https://georepublic.info
>
> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>
> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/live-demo/attachments/20170614/d64dd6f1/attachment-0001.html>