[OSGeo-Discuss] Enterprise OSDB for OSGIS
chenrg at lreis.ac.cn
chenrg at lreis.ac.cn
Mon Dec 11 19:47:55 EST 2006
Thanks for your advice. PostGIS is a wanderful project. We've followed it up for more than 2 years and will do as long as it grow big. We're considering to use PostGIS in our GirdGIS project.
Kind regards,
Chen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Woodbridge" <woodbri at swoodbridge.com>
To: <discuss at mail.osgeo.org>
Cc: "Paul Ramsey" <pramsey at refractions.net>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Enterprise OSDB for OSGIS
> Greetings,
>
> Why would you not want to build on all the work that has already been
> done with postGIS? I confess I have not read all the comparisons that
> you posted, but I will when I have a chance.
>
> postGIS provides good spatial support for postgreSQL
> postGIS is integrated with mapserver, and a long list of other OSGEO
> related projects.
> There is currently a design discussion on postGIS to to add raster support.
> postGIS has an active community of developers and users.
> I'm sure the postGIS team would value additional support from staff to
> grow and enhance postGIS.
>
> While these other databases may very well be excellent packages, this
> seems to be counter to the trend of trying to get more people to focus
> on less projects to make those projects move faster and be better. I
> would think that there should be pretty compelling reason to go in
> another direction rather than push an existing solution forward.
>
> Do you have a list of features that you feel are needed?
> How does that list compare to postGIS/postgreSQL?
> Is there any reason that the features not available could not be added
> to postGIS/postgreSQL to achieve your requirements?
>
> I'm sure you have done much more research into this than you have
> presented in your post below and I think it would help me and others to
> understand and to be able to discuss what the requirements and features are.
>
> Best regards,
> -Stephen Woodbridge
>
More information about the Mail_discuss
mailing list