[mapguide-internals] Patch submissions

[Jason Birch]

Sure :)

Let's try that and see how it works...  Bit of an experiment, I think.
Some Trac installations seem to do syntax highlighting if you name the
attachment appropriately (.diff).

Jason 

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
Kenneth, GEOGRAF A/S
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 08:59
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] Patch submissions

Ok, and what format should the attachment be in?

I think the prefered format on other OS projects is "Unified diff".
Is this the prefered format here as well?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff

Regards, Kenneth, GEOGRAF A/S



Jason Birch wrote:
> We discussed this in March.
>
> I _think_ the resolution was that you should submit a patch as an 
> attachment (or attachments) to the appropriate ticket type in Trac; 
> either bug or enhancement.
>
> As part of this, we were going to set up mapguide-internals as the 
> default owner of new tickets, so notifications would be sent to the 
> list, and discussion would stay on the list until re-assigned.  I 
> don't know if we got consensus on this point though.
>
> In the meantime, maybe just do the first part, and assign the ticket 
> to mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>
> Anyone not OK with this?
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Behalf Of Kenneth, GEOGRAF A/S
> Subject: [mapguide-internals] Patch submissions
>
> What is the prefered method and procedure for patch submission?
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>   
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals