[mapguide-internals] Patch submissions
Jason.Birch at nanaimo.ca
Tue Jun 5 12:13:51 EDT 2007
Let's try that and see how it works... Bit of an experiment, I think.
Some Trac installations seem to do syntax highlighting if you name the
attachment appropriately (.diff).
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
Kenneth, GEOGRAF A/S
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 08:59
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] Patch submissions
Ok, and what format should the attachment be in?
I think the prefered format on other OS projects is "Unified diff".
Is this the prefered format here as well?
Regards, Kenneth, GEOGRAF A/S
Jason Birch wrote:
> We discussed this in March.
> I _think_ the resolution was that you should submit a patch as an
> attachment (or attachments) to the appropriate ticket type in Trac;
> either bug or enhancement.
> As part of this, we were going to set up mapguide-internals as the
> default owner of new tickets, so notifications would be sent to the
> list, and discussion would stay on the list until re-assigned. I
> don't know if we got consensus on this point though.
> In the meantime, maybe just do the first part, and assign the ticket
> to mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> Anyone not OK with this?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Behalf Of Kenneth, GEOGRAF A/S
> Subject: [mapguide-internals] Patch submissions
> What is the prefered method and procedure for patch submission?
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the mapguide-internals