[mapguide-internals] Motion to vote on RFC 31SymbolDefinitionSupport for Edit Controls and Rich TextSupport (Markup)

[Robert Bray]

+0 Bob.

I also believe inferring the type is a far better way to go, but at the
same time understand the constraints of development. My guess is we'll
be revisiting this one sometime in the future.

Jason Birch wrote:
> +0 Jason
>  
> ... there'd better be a good UI for this stuff (even if its not effective) because I still don't get it :)  I knew I should have gone to Bob's lab instead of skipping out for the REST stuff.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Tom Fukushima
> Subject: [mapguide-internals] Motion to vote on RFC 31SymbolDefinitionSupport for Edit Controls and Rich TextSupport (Markup)
> 
> 
> 
> Now that Thomas has summarized the discussion on this RFC, let's try
> again...
> 
> 
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc31
> 
> I motion that we vote on RFC 31 SymbolDefinition Support for Edit
> Controls and Rich Text Support (Markup).
> 
> +1 Tom
> 
> Thanks
> Tom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals