[mapguide-internals] MapGuide RFC 57 - Refining the linux buildprocess and generating install packages

[Zac Spitzer]

With regards to undertaking this work in a sandbox, how is that going
to work with commit rights?

Will SVN ACL's be used to provide commit access to the people working
on the sandbox
without giving the commit access to the whole tree?

As it was mentioned that 2.1 was going to appear as a beta (back in
oct?) is the trunk in a
reasonable state for branching off into a sandbox?

What's the best approach with trac? a special milestone?

z



On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Tom Fukushima
<tom.fukushima at autodesk.com> wrote:
> Thanks for taking the initiative on this Zac.
>
> I took the liberty of adding a statement about the AGG version issue to the RFC.
>
> Also, for GEOS 3.0 we have a patch somewhere (that probably doesn't work anymore) to update MGOS for it.  Let me see if I can dig it up; I'll create a ticket for it and attach the patch.
>
> Tom
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 11:07 PM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] MapGuide RFC 57 - Refining the linux buildprocess and generating install packages
>
>
> Thanks for putting that together Zac.
>
> I'm not sure which OEM components have been modified specifically for MapGuide.  I'm pretty sure that AGG has been, and we have to make sure that we only bundle the older 2.4 version with any releases that we do to avoid contaminating our code with GPL.  Are there any other OEM components that have modifications that haven't been contributed/adopted upstream?  I see that at least GEOS and GD (libpng) have had some code modifications made to support 64 bit compilation.
>
> Tom, I'd agree that the Windows build process is easy, but maybe too easy  :)   I'd love to try swapping out some of the OEM components in the Windows build/packages for 2.1, especially Apache, PHP, and GEOS.  Unfortunately, I think that this may be a bit optimistic given that some packages (such as ACE) haven't been updated in over four years, and I don't have the developer chops to fix anything I run into.
>
> Jason
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org on behalf of Zac Spitzer
> Sent: Tue 2008-11-25 6:50 PM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: [mapguide-internals] MapGuide RFC 57 - Refining the linux buildprocess and generating install packages
>
>
>
> Following up on the various discussions about the linux build process
> I have created a draft RFC
> for refining the linux build process and generating install packages.
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc57
>
> z
>
> --
> Zac Spitzer -
> http://zacster.blogspot.com <http://zacster.blogspot.com/>
> +61 405 847 168
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>



-- 
Zac Spitzer -
http://zacster.blogspot.com
+61 405 847 168