[mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?

[Jason Birch]

Do I need to formalize this be re-submitting as a real motion?

We're currently sitting at:

+1: Tom, Bruce, Haris, Andy, Kenneth (and me)
No great objection: Paul
No comment: Bob

How about this...  by end of day Monday (GMT -7), if nobody objects, I'll treat the following as passed:

"that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer proposed by a member of the PSC (via an email to the MapGuide-Internals mailing list) without the requirement of a vote.  Sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based based on the stated needs."

In the future, I'm going make an effort to distinguish better between discussion and motion.

Jason


________________________________________
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 10:58 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] Motion RE Sandbox access?

Given that we seem to have failed on the meeting thing this week, I would like to get one of the items out of the way with a motion.

Are there any great objections to me tabling a motion worded something like:

"that the MapGuide project will grant sandbox access to any developer proposed by a member of the PSC without the requirement of a vote, and that said sandbox access can either be user-based or project-based"

?

Jason

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals