[mapguide-internals] Please review RFC 66 (Updated)
trevor.wekel at autodesk.com
Thu Jun 25 20:56:07 EDT 2009
You are correct Kenneth, the RFC should contain some additional details:
C++ method signature and class name (MgSite?) for the new GetSessionTimeout() API
HTTP method parameters and return value for GETSESSIONTIMEOUT API.
An xml schema snippet describing the changes to WebLayout.
Many of the RFCs already contain this information. http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc10 and http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc11 are examples of the required documentation.
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S [ks at geograf.dk]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:23 PM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] Please review RFC 66 (Updated)
For the other RFC's there has been a clear description of how the schema
changes would be:
It seems that RFC 66 suggests a schema change as well?
Is it required that the RFC details the schema change?
I am satisfied with the RFC otherwise.
Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
Christine Bao skrev:
> Hi all,
> I've updated RFC - 66<https://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc66>. Would you please review it again? Thank you in advance!
> Thanks & regards,
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the mapguide-internals