[mapguide-internals] mgos 2.1 state

[Stout, Warren]

I'm sorry if this isn't to the correct group. But I'm wondering the same. I have been building off the svn trunk. I assume this is where the 2.1 release will come from?

I've been building off the trunk since January on CentOS 4.7, 5.2, 5.3, Suse versions.. Ubuntu, etc. Mostly using 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 compiler. I've had many builds work. But none would run reliably.

Mostly due to issues with PostGIS and King Oracle provider causing failures. Also, there are problems with un-defined symbols like g_LogFileName in libKingOracleProvider.so 
and crypt in libPostGISProvider.so

I've see ticket 188 to address the problem with crypt. But I've seen know one else post anything about g_LogFileName.

Any pointers to the best svn to build from. And has anyone had a build actually work using PostGIS and King Oracle?

Thanks

Warren
________________________________________
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of alucas [alucas at svl.es]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 10:54 AM
To: mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [mapguide-internals] mgos 2.1 state

Hello,

I'm planning a new project and i'm thinking in mgos 2.1. What's the state of
this version? What are the bugs pending to solve?

Thanks.
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/mgos-2.1-state-tp2788558p2788558.html
Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals




*****************************************************************************
NOTICE:   The information contained in this electronic transmission is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above.  ANY
DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED, except by the intended
recipient(s). Attempts to intercept this message are in violation of 18
U.S.C. 2511(1) of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which subjects
the interceptor to fines, imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you are not
the intended recipient(s), please delete it and notify me.
*****************************************************************************