[mapguide-internals] RE: Alpha release for MGOS 2.2?

[Bruce Dechant]

The Apache/Tomcat upgrade was just build/installer work - I didn't do anything for them.

Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tom Fukushima
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:56 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Alpha release for MGOS 2.2?

Thanks.  Here's what I suggest...

Do not put out an alpha.

RFC 90 - wait for adequate-enough-for-beta resolution to your review comments (if they haven't been resolved already) and then check it in for the beta.

RFC 91 - we won't do the BDB or geos update for 2.2; I don't see us needing to hold up the beta for this.
I don't think that we need to do any code changes to upgrade to Apache 2.2.15 and Tomcat 6.0.24 --- Bruce, do you recall what needed to be done?  I think that we only the installers and build environment need to be updated.

FDO - let's use the FDO 3.5.0 that is posted on the FDO site.

I'm assuming that the above can be done within the next week or two; and that's why I say not to do an alpha.

Tom


-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:26 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Alpha release for MGOS 2.2?

Hi Tom,

I just went through the RFC list.  Here's what I have so far:

RFC 88 - AJAX Viewer support for custom initial view	
- Jackie has retracted the RFC so it is out of scope for 2.2

RFC 89 - Upgrade to PHP 5.3
- Bruce has completed this work
 
RFC 90 - Meta Tiling Support
- UV has an implementation in the sandbox and I have done an initial review.

RFC 91 - Upgrade Apache/Tomcat/geos/dbxml to the latest version
- Is this RFC slated for 2.2?  It is currently marked as such.


I have not looked at the defect list yet to see if there are any showstoppers.

One other open question is FDO.  We are currently using FDO 3.5.0 RC1.  I have been chatting with Greg a little bit and we may want to release with FDO 3.5.0 RC2.  However, there are few build complications.  I was hoping to do the Linux builds for FDO but "certain" providers require licensed SDKs.  The discussion is ongoing.


Regards,

Trevor

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tom Fukushima
Sent: April 29, 2010 10:19 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Alpha release for MGOS 2.2?

Hi Trevor,

What are the outstanding items?

Thanks
Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:51 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] Alpha release for MGOS 2.2?

Hi list,

Since we still have a few outstanding items before we release the beta, should we package up an Alpha 1 release based on the current code base?

Regards,
Trevor
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals

_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals