[mapguide-internals] Review RFC 108 - support Watermark

[Jason Birch]

I agree with the pain thing, but typically you'd only have to do it once for
a single installation (assuming it's the company logo or whatever).

I'm surprised that images wouldn't print well.  Oh, I guess if you're
printing at higher than screen DPI?  I wonder how much of this could be
mitigated with a higher-dpi image.

Jason

On 30 July 2010 20:37, Tom Fukushima wrote:

> I'll wait for updates to the RFC before replying to some items below.
>
> With respect to the "Watermark requirements are generally pretty simple"
> statement; that's true for simple copyrights statements; but for anyone who
> wants a more professional looking map with, for example, some branding, then
> a full-fledged vector-based symbol is required and defining it in XML is a
> pain.
>
> Images do not make good watermarks because they do not print well.
>
>