[mapguide-users] ODBC Points Performance

Jon Rizzo jrizzo at Langan.com
Mon Aug 6 11:51:13 EDT 2007



The x and y columns are indexed.  There does not seem to be a noticeable
difference with or without this index.



Robert Bray-2 wrote:
> 
> Jon,
> 
> Out of curiosity are the X and Y columns in SQL Server indexed? If not 
> try creating indexs on those columns and see if that helps at all.
> 
> Regards,
> Bob
> 
> Jon Rizzo wrote:
>> Thanks for the suggestion(s).  That is currently how we are serving up
>> polygons - they are drawn in an SDF file but joined with data on a SQL
>> Server so they can be labeled/themed.  The selection of the polygons
>> suffers
>> from the same problem as our point selection, so it stands to reason that
>> your suggestion probably will not help.  Our data is updated frequently,
>> so
>> it's not realistic to copy all of the the data over to SDF files.  Again,
>> that's really the whole point of having an enterprise database to begin
>> with.  I think we may have to (*sigh*) continue using ArcIMS.  This is
>> very
>> disappointing to me, but it just appears to be better at what I'm trying
>> to
>> do.
>> 
>> Also, I'm not even talking about 5,000 features here.  A typical map for
>> us
>> has 100 or so polygons and 10-20 points.  Our lag is more like 4 seconds
>> instead of 10, but that's still enough to make our users crazy.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Ismael Cams wrote:
>>> I don't know if it is an option for you but it might be sufficient to
>>> put
>>> only the x-y coordinates in an SDF together with a key that can be used
>>> to
>>> do further database queries. These SDF's can be generated out of the SQL
>>> server database you are using with some code.
>>> To get properties and other information out of the database you could go
>>> with an own faster database connection. 
>>> For the synchronization you could run the job for exporting the geometry
>>> to SDF every day or so.
>>> It needs some work, but for a layer with ~ 5000 points I had sometimes
>>> to
>>> wait up to 10s before something got selected ... 
>>>
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ODBC-Points-Performance-tf4201424s16610.html#a12018819
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



More information about the mapguide-users mailing list