[mapguide-users] Evaluating performance

[Zac Spitzer]

Flat files like SDF/SHP will always be much faster than a database.

I would be interested in a standard bench mark where we can test the
performance of every FDO driver for mapguide so we can compare them
and track any regressions or improvements... of course on the database
side of things there are a lot of variables

using FDO2FDO we could simply transform data around the diffrent FDO
datasources for performance testing.

ideally we should have a number of sample datasets, small, medium and
big. with and with out filters

z


On 8/21/07, Joel Carranza <jec at gatekeeper.com> wrote:
>
> Someone (to be precise Zac Spitzer), recently made the statement:
>
> "King Oracle is roughly about 4-5x slower now than SDF which is a big
> improvement"
>
> This got me to wonderring if and how people are systematically evaluating
> the performance of their maps/data sources. If I wanted to get a
> quantitative idea of the performance of a given layer, how would I do that?
> Are there any existing tools out there?
>
> Thoughts anyone?
>
> Joel Carranza
> Gatekeeper Systems
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Evaluating-performance-tf4308097s16610.html#a12264049
> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>


-- 
Zac Spitzer
http://zacster.blogspot.com/
+61 3 9018 5778 (voip via my pc)
+61 405 847 168 (aussie moible)