[mapguide-users] 1.1.0 and WFS?

Jason Birch Jason.Birch at nanaimo.ca
Thu Jan 25 13:10:55 EST 2007

I have an install of MGOS 1.1.0 running on Windows XP (as a bundled
config, not IIS) and it is responding with a proper capabilities
document to:


I see a schema for 1.1.0 in the install, but a request for 1.1.0
responds with the 1.0.0 capabilities doc, so I don't think the VERSION
parameter is being honoured.  Is this correct behaviour (responding with
a downgraded capabilities document when a higher version is requested)?

Andy, do you have any other FDO apps installed on that server?


-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 09:52
To: mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] 1.1.0 and WFS?

Autodesk, can you confirm that you can successfully test WFS on a
default 1.1.0 Windows install via the following URL?



-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Lee [mailto:jack.lee at autodesk.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:41 AM
To: Andy Morsell
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] 1.1.0 and WFS?


The problem doesn't seem to be a dependency problem.

The "Provider Not Registered" message means that the provider name is
not found in the providers.xml file.

Are you sure you are looking at the correct providers.xml file?

More information about the mapguide-users mailing list