[mapguide-users] UnManagedData Slow
Zac Spitzer
zac.spitzer at gmail.com
Tue Aug 19 12:20:30 EDT 2008
Was this issue resolved? Are SDF and SHP safe to pool?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 2:43 AM, Bruce Dechant
<bruce.dechant at autodesk.com> wrote:
> SDF and SHP are excluded from pooling because of an update/reader issue
> within FDO that has not been addressed yet.
> If you notice some problems with update/readers then you should leave it
> as excluded. I believe this is planned to be fixed with the next release
> of FDO post MGOS 1.2.
>
> Thanks,
> Bruce
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Nichols,
> David
> Sent: July 5, 2007 10:23 AM
> To: MapGuide Users Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] UnManagedData Slow
>
> That did it!! Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Andy
> Morsell
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:32 AM
> To: 'MapGuide Users Mail List'
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] UnManagedData Slow
>
>
> See this existing trac ticket on this topic:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/ticket/175. If you enable pooling for
> SDF (I believe SDF by default is excluded from pooling in
> serverconfig.ini) you should see the same performance increase noted in
> the ticket. The development team is aware of these issues and have set
> the milestone for this to be fixed in release 1.3
>
>
> Andy Morsell, P.E.
> Spatial Integrators, Inc.
> http://www.SpatialGIS.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of nicholda
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 5:58 AM
> To: mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [mapguide-users] UnManagedData Slow
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I hope someone can point me in the right direction, I am using 1.2 and
> have re-mapped data to a location on disk. I am seeing a noticeable
> difference in response time between managed and unmanaged data. I
> re-mapped my feature source as shown below.
>
> Original
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> <FeatureSource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="FeatureSource-1.0.0.xsd">
> <Provider>OSGeo.SDF</Provider>
> <Parameter>
> <Name>File</Name>
> <Value>>%MG_DATA_FILE_PATH%AsBuiltBldgs.sdf</Value>
> </Parameter>
> <Parameter>
> <Name>ReadOnly</Name>
> <Value>TRUE</Value>
> </Parameter>
> </FeatureSource>
>
> Modified
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> <FeatureSource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="FeatureSource-1.0.0.xsd">
> <Provider>OSGeo.SDF</Provider>
> <Parameter>
> <Name>File</Name>
> <Value>E:/FME_Data/mgos/AsBuiltBldgs.sdf</Value>
> </Parameter>
> <Parameter>
> <Name>ReadOnly</Name>
> <Value>FALSE</Value>
> </Parameter>
> </FeatureSource>
>
> After re-mapping I added the following alias to the serverconfig.ini
> file.
>
> [UnmanagedDataMappings]
> UnmanagedSdf = E:\FME_Data\mgos
>
>
> I then used the EnumerateUnmanagedData API to get the following. But I
> am not sure what to do next.
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <UnmanagedDataList
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="UnmanagedDataList-1.0.0.xsd">
> <UnmanagedDataFile>
>
> <UnmanagedDataId>[UnmanagedSdf]AsBuiltBldgs.sdf</UnmanagedDataId>
> <CreatedDate>2007-06-28T13:00:40Z</CreatedDate>
> <ModifiedDate>2007-06-28T13:00:40Z</ModifiedDate>
> <Size>563200</Size>
> </UnmanagedDataFile>
> </UnmanagedDataList>
>
> Am I on the right track for improved performance/response time or am I
> completely off base. Any suggestions are welcomed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/UnManagedData-Slow-tf4029540s16610.html#a11445964
> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************
> ************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
> computer viruses.
> ************************************************************************
> ************
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************
> ************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
> computer viruses.
> ************************************************************************
> ************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>
--
Zac Spitzer -
http://zacster.blogspot.com (My Blog)
+61 405 847 168
More information about the mapguide-users
mailing list