[mapguide-users] Render services image formats

[Gary Morin]

At the moment I think the tiled base layer has to be the same as the
overlay.

 

When I tried PNG8, The results seemed the same as JPG, text and labels are
harder to read.

 

It would be benefitial if we could specfiy the level of compression

 

Gary

 

 

 

  _____  

From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Traian Stanev
Sent: 20 March 2008 18:18
To: mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] Render services image formats

 

 

Toy can try  to split the raster data out into a tiled base layer, which
uses JPEG format. Then use PNG8 format for the vector data (either tiled
base layer or dynamic).

 

This would move most color variation to the JPEGs, which would then free
the PNG8 color table generation to work with a much smaller color map and
thus do a better job at preserving the antialiasing shades.

 

Traian

 

P.S. I am not sure if it is possible to have JPEG base layers though.

 

 

 

From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Gary Morin
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 5:58 AM
To: mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [mapguide-users] Render services image formats 

 

Hi

 

I've been investigating the render services image formats in an attempt to
improve performance over the internet

 

My first observation, it appears in MGOS 2 setting the image format in
serverconfig.ini does not affect the formats being served, it was only
when I edited the ajaxmappane.templ did I see a difference.

 

I know the default is PNG, but we can change it JPG and with MGOS2 PNG8.

 

The problem is, with PNG the map images look great, but the download size
is enormous, I'm using some raster maps and the downloads are in the
region of 1.5mb. on my internet connection it is taking in the region of 6
seconds to display the map after a pan. 

 

If I switch to JPG the download is much faster, the downloaded images are
around 250K, but the quality is poor, some text and labels are now
unreadable.

 

I have also tried the new PNG8 format, but its results were very similar
to JPG, image quality is poor.

 

Many of my clients are use to working with the old MG 6.5, even with
raster files being served it performance was great.

 

Is there a way to alter the compression ratio of a format or any plans to
allow this to be done in the future? 

 

Thanks

 

Gary

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapguide-users/attachments/20080321/082f9e0a/attachment.html