[mapguide-users] what's holding people back from upgrading to 2.0?

[Zac Spitzer]

One thing I think might be coming into play for slowing things down
is labeling with font's using AGG....specifically very small text being
fitted to complex polylines... more a hunch tho..

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:40 AM, BradM <masonb at dfo-mpo.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> Sorry I don't know the details.  Apparently this problem was fixed with the
> new release of the open source version but the MGE2009 users needed to wait
> for an official patch.
>
>
> zspitzer wrote:
>>
>> out of interest what's the tool tip fix?
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:16 AM, BradM <masonb at dfo-mpo.gc.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>> We had similar problems when zooming into large scales on our huge
>>> hydrology
>>> layer for British Columbia.  The server would take far too long to render
>>> a
>>> map.  We added the fix for tool tips and also turned off an annotation
>>> layer.  Now the maps are working as fast or faster than MGE2008.  But I
>>> want
>>> to get the hydrology annotations back online again.  I am sure that our
>>> users want to see the river names and lake names.  So we are not out of
>>> the
>>> woods yet.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> JasonBirch wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This issue is identified in RFC 52 as AGG-specific, and was in my
>>>> initial testing as well:
>>>>
>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc52
>>>>
>>>> Are you seeing the same results when you switch to the GD renderer in
>>>> 2.0.x?
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jonathan Manafi
>>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] what's holding people back from upgrading
>>>> to 2.0?
>>>>
>>>> We experienced extreme CPU and/or memory consumption when we tested MGOS
>>>>
>>>> 2.x with some of our data. We created a ticket(#459
>>>> https://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/ticket/459) to document our problems,
>>>> and I have been testing this issue with all of the updated releases, and
>>>>
>>>> I continue to see the same results. We can't zoom all the way into our
>>>> maps without the server locking up and consuming all of the CPU, which
>>>> is stopping us from moving a production environment to MGOS 2. We've
>>>> been able to modify 1.2 to suit our needs for almost everything with
>>>> plugins; and if we couldn't add a specific feature, we went in another
>>>> direction.
>>>>
>>>> So far, that has been a killer for our migration.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mapguide-users mailing list
>>>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/what%27s-holding-people-back-from-upgrading-to-2.0--tp19849764p19880963.html
>>> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-users mailing list
>>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Zac Spitzer -
>> http://zacster.blogspot.com (My Blog)
>> +61 405 847 168
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-users mailing list
>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/what%27s-holding-people-back-from-upgrading-to-2.0--tp19849764p19881447.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>



-- 
Zac Spitzer -
http://zacster.blogspot.com (My Blog)
+61 405 847 168