[mapguide-users] WMS Performance with FastCGI exe vs ISAPI dll

Kori Maleski kori.maleski at gmail.com
Tue Sep 2 13:06:56 EDT 2008


Hi all.

I am having issues with MapGuide 2.0 versus the 1.2 release with regards to
WMS performance.

 I am making 28 asynchronous WMS requests to the MapGuide server in order to
retrieve tiles.
This is on IIS configuration.  Same data set.


With MapGuide 2.0:

Dual Core test box:  each tile can take 3 - 15 seconds to retrieve depending
on request order with an average of 10 seconds.
4 Dual Core Processor server (8 Cores):  each tile can take 3 - 15 seconds
to retrieve depending on request order with an vaerage of 10 seconds.

There is no indication that the isapi dll is taking advantage of the extra
cores.

When viewing the map in ajax or fusion the map is drawn in 3 seconds or so.

The option to tune the FastCGI is not present in the Registry


With MapGuide 1.2:

 Dual Core test box:  each tile can take 2 - 5 seconds to retrieve depending
on request order with an average of 3 seconds.
4 Dual Core Processor server (8 Cores):  each tile can take 0.5 - 3 seconds
to retrieve depending on request order with an vaerage of 1 second.

The FastCGI has been configured to take advantage of the extra cores.





So the 1.2 release is 100% faster with regards to WMS requests on a properly
configured server.

Has anyone experienced the same or similar issue?
Is there a way to tune the 2.0 release ISAPI filter?




Cheers,


Kori Maleski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapguide-users/attachments/20080902/d06eb5bf/attachment.html


More information about the mapguide-users mailing list