[mapguide-users] Which is better??

Ivan Milicevic Ivan.Milicevic at supranet.hr
Thu Jan 8 06:11:17 EST 2009


For example, postion of points, geometry of polygon, attribute data of
points, lines... Basicly everything :)

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac Spitzer
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:56 AM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

what would you be editing with other wise?

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Ivan Milicevic
<Ivan.Milicevic at supranet.hr> wrote:
> Guy's, I'm not thinking about joining :) It's totally lame!
>
> What about editing geometry in SQL server? How is spatial data stored
in
> it? I don't have any clue about it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of irwan
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:18 AM
> To: mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??
>
>
> ivan, i agree with you. sdf performance is much better than read layer
> geometry from database. but if your requirement need an up-to-minute
> data(attribute), maybe joining sdf to datbase is not the best choice
>
>
> zspitzer wrote:
>>
>> joins are lame because for 100 rows it does a 100 sub queries more of
> less
>>
>> doing it all with the db is simple way more efficent
>>
>> z
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ivan Milicevic
>> <Ivan.Milicevic at supranet.hr> wrote:
>>> SDF is native Mapguide format, isn't it? So it's considerable to be
>>> faster.
>>>
>>> We server about 10-20 users per server.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>>> [mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac
> Spitzer
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:22 AM
>>> To: MapGuide Users Mail List
>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??
>>>
>>> a pure sdf solution generally speaking will be better, but a
database
>>> is way easier to manage
>>>
>>> how many users are you serving?
>>>
>>> z
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Ivan Milicevic
>>> <Ivan.Milicevic at supranet.hr> wrote:
>>>> Zac,
>>>>
>>>> and what about displaying data from SDF vs same data from SQL
> Server?
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> [mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac
>>> Spitzer
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:45 AM
>>>> To: MapGuide Users Mail List
>>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??
>>>>
>>>> if your joining, do in the database, mapguide joins aren't much
chop
>>>>
>>>> a database will scale and be faster and more reliable...
>>>>
>>>> does all depend on your data of course and how much you have
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:24 PM, irwan <anakando at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi guyss. here is the situation..
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Publish a pole layer (sdf file) that joined with attribute from
>>>> database
>>>>> using MGStudio
>>>>> 2. Publish both pole attribute and spatial data from database
> (store
>>>> pole
>>>>> geomtery coordinate) using MGStuido
>>>>>
>>>>> >From your point of view, which one comes up with a better
>>>> performance?? I
>>>>> know your asnwer and explanation is very useful for someone out
> there
>>>> who
>>>>> are very care about the performance
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://n2.nabble.com/Which-is-better---tp2126726p2126726.html
>>>>> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mapguide-users mailing list
>>>>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Zac Spitzer -
>>>> http://zacster.blogspot.com
>>>> +61 405 847 168
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mapguide-users mailing list
>>>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mapguide-users mailing list
>>>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Zac Spitzer -
>>> http://zacster.blogspot.com
>>> +61 405 847 168
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-users mailing list
>>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-users mailing list
>>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Zac Spitzer -
>> http://zacster.blogspot.com
>> +61 405 847 168
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-users mailing list
>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n2.nabble.com/Which-is-better---tp2126726p2127018.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>



-- 
Zac Spitzer -
http://zacster.blogspot.com
+61 405 847 168
_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users


More information about the mapguide-users mailing list