[mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems

[Martin Morrison]

I wouldn't say Ajax is EOL...it still has a purpose.  Get Fusion as fast and as solid as Ajax and then you can start to think about retiring Ajax.

Martin
________________________________________
From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jackie Ng [jumpinjackie at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:50 PM
To: mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems

Agreed 100%

Since Fusion is the way to do things now and the AJAX viewer is essentially
EOL, it is imperative that we have a good out of the box user story with
Fusion.

I personally have not had a clean experience with previous mapguide
releases, I always needed to patch the fusion installation straight after
installation because of some glaring bug that slipped through the cracks.

- Jackie


Rock Beans wrote:
>
> If MapGuide is released with yet another failed attempt at "Fusion"
> layouts, I feel this would be the end of the road for normal everyday
> users for a long time. I agree make sure the viewers that are
> advertised as "included" are working before the release so everyone is
> 100% happy.
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Andy Morsell<amorsell at spatialgis.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I installed MGOS 2.1 Beta yesterday and here are several Fusion problems
>> that I’m seeing:
>>
>>
>>
>> ·         Firefox is still prompting for user authentication even when
>> SESSION is passed as a URL parameter.  It works ok in IE.  This has been
>> mentioned in other threads here.
>>
>> ·         The Secondary and Main toolbars do not appear in all MapGuide
>> templates.  It looks like they may be covered by other divs.  I see this
>> in
>> both FF and IE.
>>
>> ·         Tooltip hyperlinks do not appear as clickable hyperlinks
>> anymore.
>> The text of the hyperlink appears though.  Both FF and IE.
>>
>> ·         Several tooltip problems that I have logged in Trac have not
>> been
>> fixed.  Some of these I even included the code fixes for!  These include:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/fusion/ticket/232
>>
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/fusion/ticket/236
>>
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/fusion/ticket/237
>>
>>
>>
>> I will be voting -1 on releasing MGOS 2.1 until the above Fusion problems
>> are fixed and a newer release of Fusion is included.  I realize that most
>> of
>> these problems are with Fusion, but as far as I am concerned Fusion and
>> MGOS
>> are intertwined in terms of functionality.  I will add the new items to
>> the
>> Fusion Trac in the next day or so.  My next step is to look at my ECW’s
>> and
>> MrSID’s with 2.1 since others have reported problems with that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Andy Morsell, P.E.
>>
>> Spatial Integrators, Inc.
>>
>> 47° 46' N 116° 49' W
>>
>> www.SpatialGIS.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-users mailing list
>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/2.1-Beta-%28Fusion%29-Problems-tp3163004p3178330.html
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users