[mapguide-users] 2.1 Image Format Quality Question

[Zac Spitzer]

have you tried PNG8 ?

On 19 June 2010 05:26, gom <gord.mckenzie at canam.com> wrote:
>
> I have tried PNG8 and JPG as possible substitutes for the default PNG.  In
> each case it renders the images unacceptably.  Most notably smaller test
> labels become unreadable and general linework resolution is not great.
>
> Can I set the level of JPG compression to get a compromise between PNG24 and
> JPG default quality.  I can't seem to find the setting for this?  I remember
> reading before that this was set to 75 by default.  Is it adjustable?
>
> I am using the AGG renderer and wonder if there are any other suggestions to
> reduce image size and maintain better quality?
>
> Thanks
> --
> View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/2-1-Image-Format-Quality-Question-tp5196687p5196687.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>



-- 
Zac Spitzer
Solution Architect / Director
Ennoble Consultancy Australia
http://www.ennoble.com.au
http://zacster.blogspot.com
+61 405 847 168