[mapguide-users] RDBMS connection performance in Mapguide

Martin Morrison martin.morrison at edsi.com
Wed Apr 6 20:38:42 EDT 2011

Don't be so quick to down SQL Server.  Make sure you have correct spatial indexes.  Make sure the geometry is valid.   It is quick, you just need to make sure you are using it properly.  in my experience, it is 
MUCH quicker than file based.


From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of prabhat30 [lonely_prabhat at yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 8:21 AM
To: mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [mapguide-users] RDBMS connection performance in Mapguide

Hi friends,

I created an application, having a map containing SDF connection which is
having very good performance but when i am using same map with sql server
spatial provider connection map performance became very poor.

i want to use RDBMS connection in my application because i have to do some
adding & editing operation on map. so please suggest me some other RDBMS
connections which provides batter performance then sql server 2008


View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/RDBMS-connection-performance-in-Mapguide-tp6245821p6245821.html
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
mapguide-users mailing list
mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org

More information about the mapguide-users mailing list