[mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no effect

[Trevor Wekel]

Hi Haris,

What issues are you seeing with MG OS 2.2 and GDAL?  I have received good feedback on the provider in 2.2 with the VS2008 compiled GDAL libs http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MGOS22GdalProvider


Regards,
Trevor

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Haris Kurtagic
Sent: May 29, 2011 3:25 AM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no effect

Hi Traian

We are trying to use MG OS 2.2 with GDAL and it is not stable.

Right now at customer sites we are using 2.1 with GDAL with patches we
made some time ago. I remember we had lot of discussion around gdal/mg
but can't remember whole story.

I remember the issue was with concurrent access to gdal provider ( and
also others ).

If I am right at the end, there were some bigger changes made in MG
connection manager to solve those issues ?
In two patches you submitted, there are basically two things : added
ref count to connection and creating copy of the schema ?
The refcount change is related or not to changes made in MG connection manager?

Thanks,
Haris

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Traian Stanev
<traian.stanev at autodesk.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Zack,
>
>
>
> The MapGuide PSC was against this patch back then. It is up to them to
> decide if they want it now. It's been too long and I no longer have a
> MapGuide environment set up to test it with the latest code, so it would be
> up to someone who needs this to check it in and test it, or I can merge it
> in without testing.
>
>
>
> Traian
>
>
>
>
>
> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac Spitzer
> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 2:38 AM
>
> To: MapGuide Users Mail List
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no
> effect
>
>
>
> That patch sounds pretty important, can we commit it?
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Traian Stanev <traian.stanev at autodesk.com>
> wrote:
>
> Not sure if that would help, but a patch I did a while back to fix
> refcounting issues with the GDAL provider also included an optimization
> about config file parsing which sped up opening of new GDAL connections by a
> factor of 10 at least.
>
> The patch is attached to this ticket:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/ticket/462 called
> gdal_nomutex_cachedschema.patch.
>
> It was a long time ago, but as far as I remember this optimization was key
> in case one wants to enable pooling of GDAL connections. It also removed the
> internal global mutex in the provider which made it work single-threaded
> regardless of the setting in the MapGuide configuration. That patch requires
> my addref patch attached to the same ticket.
>
> Traian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:26 AM
> To: MapGuide Users Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no
> effect
>
> Hi Gunter,
>
> Since only one raster feature source can be loaded at any given time, you
> may up with some additional load overhead if your config.xml (raster
> catalog) documents are fairly large.  As far as I know, the config.xml
> information will only remain cached for the lifetime of the connection to
> the raster feature source.  With 35 raster feature sources, it may be
> getting parsed for every raster request.
>
> Regards,
> Trevor
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Gunter Becker
> Sent: April 13, 2011 2:05 PM
> To: mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no
> effect
>
> Thanks Trevor,
>
> can I suppose that my configuration (35 raster featuresources, 50 concurrent
> user) could work with
> the single-threaded GDAL Provider or does the provider means a bottleneck
> for my application?
>
> The repository error: I will try final release as soon it is available and
> if the error exists I will post it here. I supposed it has to do something
> with the rasterprovider since I've not found any hint in logfiles on what's
> going on. Even with full error report enabled.
>
> Funding the work on the GDAL Provider: I have to discuss this with my
> company (personally I'd like to fund but it is not my decision)
>
> Thanks, Gunter
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Changing-custom-PoolSize-for-GDAL-has-no-effect-tp6268276p6270448.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>
>
> --
> Zac Spitzer
> Solution Architect / Director
> Ennoble Consultancy Australia
> http://www.ennoble.com.au
> http://zacster.blogspot.com
> +61 405 847 168
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users