[mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list

[Jason Birch]

Given the size of the project, I think it makes sense to merge the
lists.  If it gets busier and confusing later then we can look at
splitting it back out.  If we have agreement on this, then we can make
this our first e-Vote on process change and the last email on the PSC
list (which we will archive, not delete) :)

I wish this list stripped email addresses from replies automagically...
I keep forgetting.

Jason 

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Morissette
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 13:10
To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
Subject: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list

After seeing the discussions on RFC-1 split between the PSC and DEV
lists, it seems to me that having split PSC and DEV lists results in
duplicate messages for those on both lists and on partial threads for
those only on one list. In both cases that's no good. Am I the only one
to think this way?

Would we not be better with just one list? Or if we insist on having two
lists then discuss RFCs and all technical issues to the -dev list *only*
(including the vote), with the understanding that PSC members are
required to follow the -dev list?

Daniel
--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/