[mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list

[Tom Fukushima]

+1

  _____  

From: Jason Birch [mailto:Jason.Birch at nanaimo.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:42 AM
To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list


Unfortunately, I'm not used to process yet and forgot to define the
timeline for the motion.
 
I think that it should be by default 1 week from seconding of motion,
with the option to define as short a period as 48 hours for important
stuff.  Of course if everyone votes it would close earlier.
 
Also, I saw on the FDO list that they extended the IRC veto to 48 hours
to deal with timezone issues.I think that this is a good idea.
 
I'll add these items to today's meeting minutes.
 
Jason
 
  _____  

From: Daniel Morissette [mailto:dmorissette at mapgears.com]
Sent: Thu 2006-11-02 4:33 AM
To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list



I'm not voting since I'm only an observer on the PSC, but I'm glad to
see the issue has been addressed so quickly.  :)

Daniel


Paul Spencer wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2-Nov-06, at 4:28 AM, Haris Kurtagic wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> From: Bruce Dechant [mailto:bruce.dechant at autodesk.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:10 AM
>> To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org; psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
>> Subject: RE: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list
>>
>> +1
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andy Morsell [mailto:amorsell at spatialgis.com]
>> Sent: Wed 11/1/2006 7:33 PM
>> To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
>> Cc:
>> Subject: RE: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list
>>
>> +1.  I guess I should subscribe to the dev list now..........
>>
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert Bray [mailto:rbray at robertbray.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:27 PM
>> To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list
>>
>> I'll second and +1.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> Jason Birch wrote:
>> > Given the lack of objections, I'd like to move to archive the PSC
list
>> > and move all future discussions to the DEV list.
>> >
>> > Consider this a +1 once somebody second's.
>> >
>> > Jason
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Daniel Morissette [mailto:dmorissette at mapgears.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 13:10
>> > To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
>> > Subject: [mapguide-psc] PSC vs DEV list
>> >
>> > After seeing the discussions on RFC-1 split between the PSC and DEV
>> > lists, it seems to me that having split PSC and DEV lists results
in
>> > duplicate messages for those on both lists and on partial threads
for
>> > those only on one list. In both cases that's no good. Am I the only
>> > one to think this way?
>> >
>> > Would we not be better with just one list? Or if we insist on
having
>> > two lists then discuss RFCs and all technical issues to the -dev
list
>> > *only* (including the vote), with the understanding that PSC
members
>> > are required to follow the -dev list?
>> >
>> > Daniel
>> > --
>> > Daniel Morissette
>> > http://www.mapgears.com/
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Paul Spencer                          pspencer at dmsolutions.ca    |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Chief Technology Officer                                         |
> |DM Solutions Group Inc                http://www.dmsolutions.ca/ |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
>


--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapguide_psc/attachments/20061102/99eac957/attachment.html