[mapguide-psc] MapGuide's 1st RFC!

[Bruce Dechant]

Sure I can. :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Fukushima 
Sent: October 31, 2006 1:14 PM
To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [mapguide-psc] MapGuide's 1st RFC!

+1  

Bruce, while you're at it, could you also put it into the RFC template?

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Dechant 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:08 PM
To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [mapguide-psc] MapGuide's 1st RFC!

I like the idea of the status section.
If there are no objections I'll update the RFC with one.

Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Morissette [mailto:dmorissette at mapgears.com]
Sent: October 31, 2006 1:04 PM
To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [mapguide-psc] MapGuide's 1st RFC!

Bruce Dechant wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I wrote up a simple MapGuide RFC to give our process a trial run.
> 
>
http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MG_RFC_1_-_Commandline_parameter_changes
> 
> Please have a look and post any feedback.
> 

What about adding a standard header or RFC status section with the
following information that would be useful when we look at it in a few
years:

- Date (proposal date, adoption date, last update date, or all of them?)
- Author
- Status: draft, proposed/pending vote, adopted or rejected
- Implementation status: pending, under development, completed (or is
this too much detail?)
- software version this RFC applies to
- voting history

I realize that Author and Date are there at the bottom as Wiki fields,
but I think making them part of the standard header might be a good idea

in case the doc is migrated away from the wiki.

My 0.02$

Daniel
--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/