[mapguide-users] test performance
Dongjin Xing
Dongjin.Xing at autodesk.com
Wed Apr 12 17:22:17 EDT 2006
I used all three APIs on my machine. There is no human-noticeable
difference to me.
As a matter of fact, all three APIs are just the wrappers created
automatically by SWIG from the native C++ core library. The performance
difference lies only on the efficiency that a certain language/platform
can execute the web application at the web extension level.
In a decent real world enterprise map application, you can expect that
more time will spend on the MapGuide server to carry out GIS business
logic rather than on the application server.
Dongjin
-----Original Message-----
From: alucas at srtec.com [mailto:alucas at srtec.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:04 AM
To: users at mapguide.osgeo.org
Subject: [mapguide-users] test performance
Somebody has tested the performance of tree API?
What API or technology (php, .net or jsp) is more efficient in your
opinion?
I must to decide what API to choose for my project and the performance
is
the most important.
I'm MapGuide 6.5 developer, What do you think that is more efficient?
Thanks.
Antonio Lucas
Software Engineer
SER&TEC S.L
Phone: +34 96 395 95 13
www.srtec.com
Valencia (Spain)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe at mapguide.osgeo.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help at mapguide.osgeo.org
More information about the Mapguide_users
mailing list