[MapProxy] Unusual behavior with configuration symbol names and scrambled tiles?

[Bruce Crevensten]

Thanks for checking, Oliver -- I just took another look and can't recreate
this behavior, and I bet a spoiled cache somewhere was to blame.

I do wish I knew what had caused the spoiled cache in the first place,
though.  Is there an obvious misconfiguration that would cause the bad tile
arrangement seen in this screenshot?

https://github.com/ua-snap/mp-config/blob/master/a.png

Thanks,
- Bruce


On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Oliver Tonnhofer <olt at omniscale.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 02.09.2014, at 15:07, Bruce Crevensten wrote:
> > I was playing around with some cache configurations and stumbled across
> a behavior I don't understand.  Two very similar configuration files,
> experimentally using Bing as a known-good tile provider backend, where one
> displays correctly and the other has the tiles in a scrambled order, and
> the only difference I can see is the names of the symbols used to reference
> sections of the configuration (layers, caches, etc).
> >
> > Working configuration file:
> > https://gist.github.com/brucecrevensten/a065ea0f49a039475760
> >
> > Failing configuration file:
> > https://gist.github.com/brucecrevensten/288817ea067dd118a85c
>
> This looks fine here. Do you have old tiles in your cache?
>
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
>
> --
> Oliver Tonnhofer  | Omniscale GmbH & Co KG  | http://omniscale.com
> OpenStreetMap WMS and tile services         | http://maps.omniscale.com
>
>
>
>


-- 
*Bruce Crevensten*


*Senior Software Engineer*
(SNAP) Scenarios Network for Alaska & Arctic Planning
www.snap.uaf.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapproxy/attachments/20140909/4a6dd96e/attachment.html>