[MapProxy] Solved... and tms?
Michael Heerdegen
michael_heerdegen at web.de
Fri Dec 6 08:01:05 PST 2024
Hi Daniel,
> [...] The workaround would be, to configure a third cache with the
> other both caches as source and taking this as source for the
> layer. You can use "disable_storage: true", if you did not want to
> storage the third cache, too.
This approach is working great.
I also switched the order of the two layers as had been suggested, and
finally added bbox specs, although partly by wild guessing which srs to
specify. Seems I got it more or less right.
And I guess it would maybe be more efficient to cache the final merging
(i.e. the new) layer instead of the other ones, because this is the one
I need anyway and caching it avoids repeated image processing - while the
other layers are not needed when the actually requested layer is cached.
Though, I still might cache the shading tiles because I might want to
use them for other maps, too.
This gives me a result as below.
I am very happy now because everything works as I imagined. Thanks to
all for not losing patience with my trouble.
Regards,
Michael.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: my-mapproxy.yaml
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1476 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapproxy/attachments/20241206/17d24459/attachment.obj>
More information about the MapProxy
mailing list