[geojquery] Current infrastructure

[Marc Jansen]

Hi all,

I am +1 on a change in infrastructure. And while we are at it: Im pro 
git/github as well.

When the name is finally fixed, someone (Volker?) has my personal go to 
set up everything.

Thanks and regards,
Marc



Am 06.07.2010 11:07, schrieb Roald de Wit:
> Hi Volker and list,
>
> Setting up a Trac instance on OSGeo should probably not much more than 
> creating ticket in OSGeo's SAC. I'd be happy to initiate this, but 
> will wait till you hear back from the jQuery forum.
>
> WRT git: OL3 is being developed on github in order to allow rapid 
> development. I think that geojquery is in a similar state as OL3: many 
> big changes will be made, many experimental branches, etc.
>
> We need to learn git one day, why not now? :-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Roald
>
> On 06/07/10 18:36, Volker Mische wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I really dislike the current infrastructure. I think we should move 
>> ASAP to OSGeo with a nice Trac instance. So if anyone could make this 
>> happen it would be great (I sadly don't have time myself).
>>
>> I've also posted (as promised months ago) at the jQuery forum if it's 
>> OK to use the name geojquery [1]. Let's see what happens (might be 
>> important before a project is setup on OSGeo).
>>
>> Another alternative would be to move to Github/Gitorious, though I 
>> can understand if the burden of learing Git is too high.
>>
>> [1] http://forum.jquery.com/topic/using-jquery-in-a-plugin-name
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Volker
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geojquery mailing list
>> Geojquery at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geojquery
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geojquery mailing list
> Geojquery at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geojquery
>