WMS GetFeatureInfo output formats
Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]
Tom.Kralidis at EC.GC.CA
Tue Jun 21 19:02:32 EDT 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Morissette [mailto:dmorissette at dmsolutions.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 June, 2005 13:37
> To: Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]
> Cc: MAPSERVER-DEV at LISTS.UMN.EDU
> Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-DEV] WMS GetFeatureInfo output formats
>
>
> Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote:
> > Now that WFS GetFeature responses are valid XML for both GML2 and
> > GML3L0 (good work Steve!), and given bug
> > http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=801, this
> might be a
> > good time to clean up WMS GetFeatureInfo to produce valid
> XML. Having
> > said this, should we also provide finer grained MIME types for
> > supported GetFeatureInfo, i.e.:
> >
> > application/vnd.ogc.gml
> > application/vnd.ogc.gml3l0
> >
> > ...or should we just cite application/vnd.ogc.gml and use GML3 from
> > here on in. Interested in people's comments on this one.
> >
>
> I think we should keep the old GML2-based format and offer
> another type
> for GML3L0 so that client apps that rely on the older format
> continue to
> work. BTW, is application/vnd.ogc.gml3l0 the recommended MIME
> type for
> GML3L0?
>
OGC Discussion Paper 03-003r10 cites:
x-application/gml:2
x-application/gml:3
x-application/gml:3:0
..Tom
> Daniel
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Daniel Morissette dmorissette at dmsolutions.ca
> DM Solutions Group http://www.dmsolutions.ca/
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
More information about the mapserver-dev
mailing list