RFC 14 out for comment...
woodbri at SWOODBRIDGE.COM
Mon Apr 10 19:34:35 EDT 2006
Thanks for the RFC. A couple of questions:
Can up update it and add what would change from a mapscript perspective?
I'm not sure I understand what the alternative approaches would be or
what the feature/benefits/issues of them might be. Then again, I'm not
sure I need to know :) but it would likely generate more discussion to
compare and contrast them.
Does this need to be added to the test plans? This is small enough that
it might not, but regardless, you might want to note that you thought
about it in the RFC for completeness.
Given what I have read, and the fact that it presumably does what was
requested in the bug ... +1 from a non voter.
Steve Lime wrote:
> Hi all: I posted a new RFC for supporting relative coordinates (primarily for inline features)
> to the mapserver website. Comments would be appreciated. The actual computations
> are trivial to make this work. The issues are more implementation related- hanging a
> new parameter off a shapeObj vs something else and so on...
> I have coded up one solution and the end result is very useful.
More information about the mapserver-dev