RFC 14 out for comment...

[Stephen Woodbridge]

Hi Steve,

Thanks for the RFC. A couple of questions:

Can up update it and add what would change from a mapscript perspective?

I'm not sure I understand what the alternative approaches would be or 
what the feature/benefits/issues of them might be. Then again, I'm not 
sure I need to know :) but it would likely generate more discussion to 
compare and contrast them.

Does this need to be added to the test plans? This is small enough that 
it might not, but regardless, you might want to note that you thought 
about it in the RFC for completeness.

Given what I have read, and the fact that it presumably does what was 
requested in the bug ...  +1 from a non voter.

-Steve W

Steve Lime wrote:
> Hi all: I posted a new RFC for supporting relative coordinates (primarily for inline features)
> to the mapserver website. Comments would be appreciated. The actual computations
> are trivial to make this work. The issues are more implementation related- hanging a
> new parameter off a shapeObj vs something else and so on...
> 
> I have coded up one solution and the end result is very useful.
> 
> Steve
>